Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35474657›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2021

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, presentation, prognosis, and management.

Nithesh Ranasinha, Altan Omer, Yiannis Philippou, Eli Harriss, Lucy Davies, Ken Chow, Paolo M Chetta, Andrew Erickson, Timothy Rajakumar, Ian G Mills and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. PSMA PET-CT in the Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Nithesh RanasinhaNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8888-9198
Altan OmerNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Yiannis PhilippouNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Eli HarrissBodleian Health Care Libraries University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Lucy DaviesNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Ken ChowDepartment of Surgery Royal Melbourne Hospital University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5904-2684
Paolo M ChettaDana Farber Cancer Institute Harvard MA USA.
Andrew EricksonNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Timothy RajakumarNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Ian G MillsNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Richard J BryantNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8330-9251
Freddie C HamdyNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Declan G MurphyDivision of Cancer Surgery Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne VIC Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7500-5899
Massimo LodaDana Farber Cancer Institute Harvard MA USA.
Christopher M HovensDepartment of Surgery Royal Melbourne Hospital University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC Australia.
Niall M CorcoranDepartment of Surgery Royal Melbourne Hospital University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC Australia.
Clare VerrillNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Alastair D LambNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-7155
University of Oxford · GBThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUCornell University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22748Cancer Research UK 25812Prostate Cancer UK PA14-022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) is relatively rare, but is nonetheless the second most common subtype of prostate cancer. First described in 1967, opinion is still divided regarding its biology, prognosis, and outcome. Objectives: To systematically interrogate the literature to clarify the epidemiology, diagnosis, management, progression, and survival statistics of DAC. Materials and methods: We conducted a literature search of five medical databases from inception to May 04 2020 according to PRISMA criteria using search terms "prostate ductal adenocarcinoma" OR "endometriod adenocarcinoma of prostate" and variations of each. Results: Some 114 studies were eligible for inclusion, presenting 2 907 170 prostate cancer cases, of which 5911 were DAC. [Correction added on 16 January 2021 after the first online publication: the preceding statement has been corrected in this current version.] DAC accounts for 0.17% of prostate cancer on meta-analysis (range 0.0837%-13.4%). The majority of DAC cases were admixed with predominant acinar adenocarcinoma (AAC). Median Prostate Specific Antigen at diagnosis ranged from 4.2 to 9.6 ng/mL in the case series.DAC was more likely to present as T3 (RR1.71; 95%CI 1.53-1.91) and T4 (RR7.56; 95%CI 5.19-11.01) stages, with far higher likelihood of metastatic disease (RR4.62; 95%CI 3.84-5.56; all Conclusion: When drawing conclusions about DAC it is important to note the heterogenous nature of the data. DAC is often diagnosed incidentally post-treatment, perhaps due to lack of a single, universally applied histopathological definition. As such, DAC is likely underreported in clinical practice and the literature. Poorer prognosis and outcomes for DAC compared to AAC merit further research into genetic composition, evolution, diagnosis, and treatment of this surprisingly common prostate cancer sub-type. Patient summary: Ductal prostate cancer is a rare but important form of prostate cancer. This review demonstrates that it tends to be more serious at detection and more likely to spread to unusual parts of the body. Overall survival is worse with this type of prostate cancer and urologists need to be aware of the presence of ductal prostate cancer to alter management decisions and follow-up.

Indexed as

acinar carcinomaductal carcinomaprostate cancerrecurrencesurvival

Identifiers

PMID35474657
PMCPMC8988764
OpenAlexW3120347882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.