Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35474542›Full record

ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2022

Extracranial medulloepithelioma: a review of the literature.

David Bailey, Christine Mau, Christina Toepke, Elizabeth Finch, Elias Rizk

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Spinal Cord Medulloepithelioma in a Cat.Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Bilateral medulloepithelioma of the ciliary body: a case report.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David BaileyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA. Dbailey3@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3557-0607
Christine MauDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8385-5084
Christina ToepkePediatric Hematology and Oncology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6604-1767
Elizabeth FinchPediatric Hematology and Oncology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1582-8460
Elias RizkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6424-6091
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedulloepithelioma is a rare, malignant tumor that typically arises in the periventricular region of the cerebral hemispheres or the ciliary body of the eye. Even rarer still is the extracranial manifestation of medulloepithelioma with only 12 cases reported to date. Our purpose is to report a case of an intradural, extra-medullary medulloepithelioma and review the limited literature about diagnosis and treatment of this extremely rare pathology.

methodsPubMed was queried using search terms "peripheral medulloepithelioma" and "pre-sacral medulloepithelioma." Medulloepitheliomas which were intraocular or occurred in reproductive organs were excluded. Patients' age, sex, the symptomatic period prior to diagnosis, primary tumor site, stage, treatment regimen, pathologic description, and survival outcomes were collected.

resultsWe present a case of extracranial medulloepithelioma in an 8-year-old male. Morphology of the neoplasm was representative of medulloepithelioma but there was no amplification of C19MC. Additionally, the neoplasm stained positive for CD99. Twelve other cases of extracranial medulloepithelioma were found in literature review.

conclusionsThe rarity of extracranial medulloepithelioma makes for a challenging diagnosis. Designing an optimal treatment strategy is difficult because of a scarcity of cases and wide variety in locations and treatments. Our case provides an example of treatment including resection, intense induction chemotherapy, consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue, craniospinal proton radiation therapy, and metronomic chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Neuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitiveProton TherapyChildHumansMaleEmbryonal neoplasmExtracranial medulloepitheliomaRare tumorsSpine tumors

Identifiers

PMID35474542
OpenAlexW4224929184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.