Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35474190›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2022

Evaluation of two weight stigma scales in Malaysian university students: weight self-stigma questionnaire and perceived weight stigma scale.

Wan Ying Gan, Serene En Hui Tung, Kamolthip Ruckwongpatr, Simin Ghavifekr, Chirawat Paratthakonkun, Ira Nurmala, Yen-Ling Chang, Janet D Latner, Ru-Yi Huang, Chung-Ying Lin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Weight-based discrimination and cortisol output: A systematic review.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prevalence and Correlates of Weight Stigma among Postpartum Women in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wan Ying Gan *Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Serene En Hui Tung *Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Kamolthip RuckwongpatrInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Rd, Tainan, 701401, Taiwan.
Simin GhavifekrFaculty of Education, University of Malaya (UM), 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Chirawat ParatthakonkunCollege of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, Sala Ya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Ira NurmalaDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Yen-Ling ChangDepartment of Family Medicine, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Janet D LatnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Ru-Yi HuangDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, E-DA Hospital, No. 1, Yida Rd., Yanchao Dist., Kaohsiung, 82445, Taiwan. ruyi.star@gmail.com.
Chung-Ying LinInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Rd, Tainan, 701401, Taiwan. cylin36933@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-4242

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 110-2410-H-006-115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) and Perceived Weight Stigma Scale (PWS) among Malaysian university students.

methodsUniversity students who were studying in a Malaysia university with a mean age of 24.0 years (n = 380; females 71.6%) were recruited through convenience sampling between 19 August and 30 September 2021. They completed a Google Form consisting of information on sociodemographic background, weight stigma, psychological distress and self-reported body weight and height. Psychometric testing was conducted using the classical test theory (including confirmatory factor analysis) and Rasch models to confirm the two-factor structure of WSSQ and the unidimensional structure of the PWS using the various fit indices. Concurrent validity of the total scores of WSSQ and PWS with psychological distress and body mass index (BMI) was also investigated. Internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha was conducted.

resultsThe confirmatory factor analyses and Rasch analyses verified the two-factor structure for the WSSQ and the single-factor structure for the PWS. Both the WSSQ and PWS showed good internal consistency and good concurrent validity as demonstrated by their significant correlations with psychological distress and BMI.

conclusionThe WSSQ and PWS have strong validity and reliability, and they can both be used to assess weight stigma among Malaysian university students. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V: Descriptive study.

Indexed as

Weight PrejudiceAdultFemaleHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf ConceptSocial StigmaStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultEvaluation instrumentPsychometricsWeightWeight stigmaYoung adults

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.