Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35474179›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2022

Renal denervation in resistant hypertension: a review of clinical trials and future perspectives.

Eiichiro Yamamoto, Daisuke Sueta, Kenichi Tsujita

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eiichiro YamamotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science and Center for Metabolic Regulation of Healthy Aging (CMHA), Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan. eyamamo@kumamoto-u.ac.jp.
Daisuke SuetaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science and Center for Metabolic Regulation of Healthy Aging (CMHA), Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Kenichi TsujitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science and Center for Metabolic Regulation of Healthy Aging (CMHA), Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A previous report using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey demonstrated an increase in the prevalence of resistant hypertension, which does not respond to traditional therapy and medication. Studies using various animal hypertensive models have demonstrated significant blood pressure (BP) reduction following renal artery denervation (RDN). Catheter-based RDN became available in clinical trials as a possible treatment option for resistant hypertension. Although first clinical trials of RDN have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this treatment mortality for lowering BP in patients with resistant hypertension, the role of RDN has been questioned since the results of the Symplicity HTN-3 trial. Considering the ethnic differences demonstrated in the Symplicity HTN-Japan and Global Symplicity registry, by contrast, RDN might be an effective for resistant hypertension in Asian population. Here, we discuss RDN applications and technology, the old and new clinical evidence of RDN, patients' selection of RDN responder, and optimization of RDN procedure in this review. The available evidence demonstrates that RDN could be effective in carefully selected patients with resistant hypertension, paving the way for future research in this area.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHypertensionBlood PressureClinical Trials as TopicDenervationHumansKidneyNutrition SurveysTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsRenal denervationResisitant hypertensionReview

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.