Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35474078›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Structural and functional differentiation between compressive and glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Poramaet Laowanapiban, Kanchalika Sathianvichitr, Niphon Chirapapaisan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of the retinal microvasculature between compressive and glaucomatous optic neuropathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Poramaet LaowanapibanOphthalmology Service, Mettapracharak (Wat Rai Khing) Hospital, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Kanchalika SathianvichitrDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Niphon ChirapapaisanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. niphon.chi@mahidol.ac.th.
Mahidol University · THSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical diagnoses of slow, progressive, painless visual losses with various degrees of visual field (VF) losses and disc atrophy are often confused between suprasellar compressive optic neuropathy (CON) and open-angle glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON). We plotted the thickness of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) against the mean deviation (MD) of the VF of 34 eyes of CON at diagnosis, 30 eyes of CON after therapy, 29 eyes of GON, and 60 eyes of healthy controls in a cross-sectional investigation. At diagnosis, a disproportionally early pattern of structural thinning compared with the corresponding VF losses was unique to CON. GON- and CON-specific thinning parameters were generally useful in differentiating GON and CON from moderate to severe MD losses, but early MD losses (0 to - 6 dB) overlapped with GON in a CON-stage specific manner. GON-specific thinning parameters, RNFL in the inferior sector, and inferior to temporal macular GCIPL ratio showed overlap with posttreatment CON in the early MD losses with AUCs of 0.916 (95% CI 0.860-0.971; P < 0.001) and 0.890 (95% CI 0.811-0.968; P < 0.001), respectively. In comparison, CON-specific thinning parameters, superonasal, and inferonasal GCIPL showed overlap with CON at diagnosis for early MD losses. Overall, the nasal-to-temporal macular GCIPL ratio showed good discrimination between CON and GON throughout the MD range, with an AUC of 0.923 (95% CI 0.870-0.976; P < 0.001). Comparing GON with all stages of CON, the cut-point of 0.95 showed the lower nasal-to-temporal GCIPL ratio had a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 90% for CON. However, the cut-point of 1.10 showed the superior-to-inferior GCIPL ratio had a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 98% for GON.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOptic Nerve DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRare DiseasesRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID35474078
PMCPMC9042947
OpenAlexW4224437570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.