Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35474037›Full record

Observational studyNeurocritical care2022

Prognosis Predictions by Families, Physicians, and Nurses of Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: Agreement and Accuracy.

Whitney A Kiker, Rachel Rutz Voumard, Wesley Plinke, W T Longstreth, J Randall Curtis, Claire J Creutzfeldt

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Whitney A KikerDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. wkiker@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0657-1571
Rachel Rutz VoumardDepartment of Neurology, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Wesley PlinkeOregon Health and Sciences University School of Medicine, Portland, OR, USA.
W T LongstrethDepartment of Neurology, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Randall CurtisDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Claire J CreutzfeldtCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Palliative Care Research Training GrantT32HL125195 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KROSS, ERIN KATHRYN, SHARMA, RASHMI K. · 2015 to 2024
$3.2M
Navigating Patients and Families through the Neuro-ICUK23NS099421 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CREUTZFELDT, CLAIRE JOHANNA · 2017 to 2021
$951k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL125195NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS099421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective shared decision-making relies on some degree of alignment between families and the medical team regarding a patient's likelihood of recovery. Patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) are often unable to participate in decisions, and therefore family members make decisions on their behalf. The goal of this study was to evaluate agreement between prognostic predictions by families, physicians, and nurses of patients with SABI regarding their likelihood of regaining independence and to measure each group's prediction accuracy.

methodsThis observational cohort study, conducted from 01/2018 to 07/2020, was based in the neuroscience and medical/cardiac intensive care units of a single center. Patient eligibility included a diagnosis of SABI-specifically stroke, traumatic brain injury, or hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy-and a Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12 after hospital day 2. At enrollment, families, physicians, and nurses were asked separately to predict a patient's likelihood of recovering to independence within 6 months on a 0-100 scale, regardless of whether a formal family meeting had occurred. True outcome was based on modified Rankin Scale assessment through a family report or medical chart review. Prognostic agreement was measured by (1) intraclass correlation coefficient; (2) mean group prediction comparisons using paired Student's t-tests; and (3) prevalence of concordance, defined as an absolute difference of less than 20 percentage points between predictions. Accuracy for each group was measured by calculating the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (C statistic) and compared by using DeLong's test.

resultsData were collected from 222 patients and families, 45 physicians, and 103 nurses. Complete data on agreement and accuracy were available for 187 and 177 patients, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient, in which 1 indicates perfect correlation and 0 indicates no correlation, was 0.49 for physician-family pairs, 0.40 for family-nurse pairs, and 0.66 for physician-nurse pairs. The difference in mean predictions between families and physicians was 23.5 percentage points (p < 0.001), 25.4 between families and nurses (p < 0.001), and 1.9 between physicians and nurses (p = 0.38). Prevalence of concordance was 39.6% for family-physician pairs, 30.0% for family-nurse pairs, and 56.2% for physician-nurse pairs. The C statistic for prediction accuracy was 0.65 for families, 0.82 for physicians, and 0.76 for nurses. The p values for differences in C statistics were < 0.05 for family-physician and family-nurse groups and 0.18 for physician-nurse groups.

conclusionsFor patients with SABI, agreement in predictions between families, physicians, and nurses regarding likelihood of recovery is poor. Accuracy appears higher for physicians and nurses compared with families, with no significant difference between physicians and nurses.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesPhysiciansFamilyHumansIntensive Care UnitsPrognosisBrain injuryCommunicationNeurocritical careOutcomesPalliative carePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35474037
PMCPMC10760982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.