ArticleNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation2022
Heterogeneity of Acetylcholine Receptor Autoantibody-Mediated Complement Activity in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis.
Article in Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathogenic properties of myasthenia gravis AChR autoantibodies associate with clinical response to efgartigimod.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ravulizumab in Adults With Anti-Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody-Positive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Final Results From the Phase 3 CHAMPION MG Open-Label Extension.European journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Time to response with ravulizumab, a long-acting terminal complement inhibitor, in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis.European journal of neurology · 2024Trial
- Long-term efficacy and safety of ravulizumab in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis: results from the phase 3 CHAMPION MG open-label extension.Journal of neurology · 2023Trial
- Ravulizumab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis.Journal of neurology · 2023Trial
- Antibody-Dependent Cellular Phagocytosis and Cytotoxicity in Patients With LGI1 and CASPR2 Encephalitis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Functional Profiling of Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies Informs Therapeutic Outcome of FcRn Inhibitor Therapy in Myasthenia Gravis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- The human IG heavy chain constant gene locus is enriched for large structural variants and coding polymorphisms that vary among human populations.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Myasthenia gravis: from recognition of heterogeneity to a paradigm shift toward precision therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Effectiveness and safety of telitacicept in refractory ocular myasthenia gravis: a retrospective, real-world study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
- Therapeutic IgG- and IgM-specific proteases disarm the acetylcholine receptor autoantibodies that drive myasthenia gravis pathology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The human IG heavy chain constant gene locus is enriched for large structural variants and coding polymorphisms that vary among human populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- AChR Autoantibody Pathogenic Properties Are Heterogeneously Distributed and Undergo Temporal Changes Among Patients With Myasthenia Gravis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2025Article
- Therapeutic strategies targeting complement in myasthenia gravis patients.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Article
- Myasthenia gravis in 2025: five new things and four hopes for the future.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Antibodies in neurological diseases: Established, emerging, explorative.Immunological reviews · 2024Review
- Identification of disease phenotypes in acetylcholine receptor-antibody myasthenia gravis using proteomics-based consensus clustering.EBioMedicine · 2024Article
- Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H3 is a potential biomarker for disease activity in myasthenia gravis.Acta neuropathologica · 2024Article
- Myasthenia gravis: the future is here.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesAutoantibodies targeting the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), found in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), mediate pathology through 3 mechanisms: complement-directed tissue damage, blocking of the acetylcholine binding site, and internalization of the AChR. Clinical assays, used to diagnose and monitor patients, measure only autoantibody binding. Consequently, they are limited in providing association with disease burden, understanding of mechanistic heterogeneity, and monitoring therapeutic response. The objective of this study was to develop a cell-based assay that measures AChR autoantibody-mediated complement membrane attack complex (MAC) formation.
methodsAn HEK293T cell line-modified using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to disrupt expression of the complement regulator genes (CD46, CD55, and CD59)-was used to measure AChR autoantibody-mediated MAC formation through flow cytometry.
resultsSerum samples (n = 155) from 96 clinically confirmed AChR MG patients, representing a wide range of disease burden and autoantibody titer, were tested along with 32 healthy donor (HD) samples. AChR autoantibodies were detected in 139 of the 155 (89.7%) MG samples through a cell-based assay. Of the 139 AChR-positive samples, autoantibody-mediated MAC formation was detected in 83 (59.7%), whereas MAC formation was undetectable in the HD group or AChR-positive samples with low autoantibody levels. MAC formation was positively associated with autoantibody binding in most patient samples; ratios (mean fluorescence intensity) of MAC formation to AChR autoantibody binding ranged between 0.27 and 48, with a median of 0.79 and an interquartile range of 0.43 (0.58-1.1). However, the distribution of ratios was asymmetric and included extreme values; 16 samples were beyond the 10-90 percentile, with high MAC to low AChR autoantibody binding ratio or the reverse. Correlation between MAC formation and clinical disease scores suggested a modest positive association (rho = 0.34, DISCUSSION: A novel assay for evaluating AChR autoantibody-mediated complement activity was developed. A subset of patients that lacks association between MAC formation and autoantibody binding or disease burden was identified. The assay may provide a better understanding of the heterogeneous autoantibody molecular pathology and identify patients expected to benefit from complement inhibitor therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.