Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35473729›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Rationale and design of the CORE (COrticosteroids REvised) study: protocol.

Suzanne P Stam, Annet Vulto, Michel J Vos, Michiel N Kerstens, Abraham Rutgers, Ido Kema, Daan J Touw, Stephan Jl Bakker, André P van Beek

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04733144 (An Bioequivalence Study of Prednisolone and Dexamethasone; Corticosteroids Revised - The CORE Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04733144 phase1unknown statusnot on this map

An Bioequivalence Study of Prednisolone and Dexamethasone; Corticosteroids Revised - The CORE Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2021 to 2022Enrolled24ConditionsHealthy VolunteersArmsPrednisolone, Dexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suzanne P Stam *Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0286-426X
Annet Vulto *Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michel J VosLaboratory Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michiel N KerstensInternal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abraham RutgersRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ido KemaLaboratory Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Daan J TouwClincal Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Stephan Jl BakkerInternal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
André P van BeekInternal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands a.p.van.beek@umcg.nl.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCorticosteroids are an important pillar in many anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive treatment regimens and are available in natural and synthetic forms, which are considered equipotent if clinical bioequivalence data are used. Current clinical bioequivalence data are however based on animal studies or studies with subjective endpoints. Furthermore, advancement in steroid physiology with regard to metabolism, intracellular handling and receptor activation have not yet been incorporated. Therefore, this study aims to re-examine the clinical bioequivalence and dose effects of the most widely used synthetic corticosteroids, prednisolone and dexamethasone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this double-blind, randomised cross-over clinical trial, 24 healthy male and female volunteers aged 18-75 years, will be included. All volunteers will randomly receive either first a daily dose of 7.5 mg prednisolone for 1 week, immediately followed by a daily dose of 30 mg prednisolone for 1 week, or first a presumed clinical bioequivalent dose of 1.125 mg dexamethasone per day, immediately followed by 4.5 mg of dexamethasone per day for 1 week. After a wash-out period of 4-8 weeks, the other treatment will be applied. The primary study endpoint is the difference in free cortisol excretion in 24 hours urine. Secondary endpoints will include differences in immunological parameters, blood pressure and metabolic measurements. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Groningen (METC 2020.398). The results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04733144), and in the Dutch trial registry (NL9138).

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesHydrocortisoneAnimalsDexamethasoneDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMalePrednisoloneRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdrenal Cortex HormonesDexamethasoneHydrocortisonePrednisoloneCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYGeneral endocrinologyINTERNAL MEDICINESex steroids & HRT

Identifiers

PMID35473729
PMCPMC9045047
OpenAlexW4225009900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.