ArticleGenome biology2022
Comprehensive enhancer-target gene assignments improve gene set level interpretation of genome-wide regulatory data.
Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genes, other than Muc5b, are associated with bleomycin-induced lung injury.Communications biology · 2026Article
- CRM-TI: an enhanced pipeline for computationally assigning the target genes of cis-regulatory modules by considering comprehensive long-range regulation mechanisms.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Major waves of H2A.Z incorporation during mouse oogenesis and preimplantation embryo development.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Divergent combinations of enhancers encode spatial gene expression.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Atlas of nascent RNA transcripts reveals tissue-specific enhancer to gene linkages.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Enhancer regulatory networks globally connect non-coding breast cancer loci to cancer genes.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Identification and Copy Number Variant Analysis of Enhancer Regions of Genes Causing Spinocerebellar Ataxia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Parkinson's disease risk enhancers in microglia.iScience · 2024Article
- Refined read-out: The hUHRF1 Tandem-Tudor domain prefers binding to histone H3 tails containing K4me1 in the context of H3K9me2/3.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- CanMethdb: a database for genome-wide DNA methylation annotation in cancers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRevealing the gene targets of distal regulatory elements is challenging yet critical for interpreting regulome data. Experiment-derived enhancer-gene links are restricted to a small set of enhancers and/or cell types, while the accuracy of genome-wide approaches remains elusive due to the lack of a systematic evaluation. We combined multiple spatial and in silico approaches for defining enhancer locations and linking them to their target genes aggregated across >500 cell types, generating 1860 human genome-wide distal enhancer-to-target gene definitions (EnTDefs). To evaluate performance, we used gene set enrichment (GSE) testing on 87 independent ENCODE ChIP-seq datasets of 34 transcription factors (TFs) and assessed concordance of results with known TF Gene Ontology annotations, and other benchmarks.
resultsThe top ranked 741 (40%) EnTDefs significantly outperform the common, naïve approach of linking distal regions to the nearest genes, and the top 10 EnTDefs perform well when applied to ChIP-seq data of other cell types. The GSE-based ranking of EnTDefs is highly concordant with ranking based on overlap with curated benchmarks of enhancer-gene interactions. Both our top general EnTDef and cell-type-specific EnTDefs significantly outperform seven independent computational and experiment-based enhancer-gene pair datasets. We show that using our top EnTDefs for GSE with either genome-wide DNA methylation or ATAC-seq data is able to better recapitulate the biological processes changed in gene expression data performed in parallel for the same experiment than our lower-ranked EnTDefs.
conclusionsOur findings illustrate the power of our approach to provide genome-wide interpretation regardless of cell type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.