ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022
Dissociable use-dependent processes for volitional goal-directed reaching.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human Steering Control Under Unpredictable Disturbances.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Target configuration determines how and what we learn during sensorimotor adaptation.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Sequential effects in reaching reveal efficient coding in motor planning.Science advances · 2025Article
- Indirect feedback hinders explicit sensorimotor adaptation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Effector selection precedes movement specification: evidence from repetition effects in motor planning.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Sequential Effects in Reaching Reveal Efficient Coding in Motor Planning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Motor adaptation is reduced by symbolic compared to sensory feedback.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Limb-related sensory prediction errors and task-related performance errors facilitate human sensorimotor learning through separate mechanisms.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Reinforcement Learning during Locomotion.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Implicit reward-based motor learning.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Cortically Evoked Movement in Humans Reflects History of Prior Executions, Not Plan for Upcoming Movement.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Implicit reward-based motor learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Understanding implicit sensorimotor adaptation as a process of proprioceptive re-alignment.eLife · 2022Article
- Dissociable use-dependent processes for volitional goal-directed reaching.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Time to reconcile research findings and clinical practice on upper limb neurorehabilitation.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repetition of specific movement biases subsequent actions towards the practiced movement, a phenomenon known as use-dependent learning (UDL). Recent experiments that impose strict constraints on planning time have revealed two sources of use-dependent biases, one arising from dynamic changes occurring during motor planning and another reflecting a stable shift in motor execution. Here, we used a distributional analysis to examine the contribution of these biases in reaching. To create the conditions for UDL, the target appeared at a designated 'frequent' location on most trials, and at one of six 'rare' locations on other trials. Strikingly, the heading angles were bimodally distributed, with peaks at both frequent and rare target locations. Despite having no constraints on planning time, participants exhibited a robust bias towards the frequent target when movements were self-initiated quickly, the signature of a planning bias; notably, the peak near the rare target was shifted in the frequently practiced direction, the signature of an execution bias. Furthermore, these execution biases were not only replicated in a delayed-response task but were also insensitive to reward. Taken together, these results extend our understanding of how volitional movements are influenced by recent experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.