SynthesisJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2022
Acupoint application therapies for essential hypertension: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuity of care combined with TCM acupoint application improves blood pressure control and quality of life in elderly hypertensive patients: a retrospective study with bootstrap mediation analysis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Multidimensional Mechanisms of Hypertension and Advances in Diagnosis and Integrated TCM-Based Treatment: A Review.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Cochrane reviews of acupuncture are dated, do not account for the specific effects of sham controls and likely underestimate the efficacy of acupuncture therapy.Integrative medicine research · 2025Review
- A commentary on "Acupoint application therapies for essential hypertension: a systematic review and Meta-analysis".Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupoint application therapies (AA) for hypertension.
methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Center Controlled Trials Register, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and Wanfang Med Online Database from their inceptions to October 7, 2019. No language restriction was applied. We included randomized clinical trials testing AA against Western Medicine, AA versus placebo, AA combined with Western Medicine versus Western Medicine. Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were conducted according to the Cochrane standards.
resultsTotally 41 trials with 3772 participants were included. The methodological quality of the included trials was evaluated as generally low. AA plus Western Medicine significantly lowered systolic blood pressure (BP) [weighted mean difference (): -10.36, 95% confidence intervals (): -12.62, -8.10; 0.000 01], diastolic BP (: -5.71, 95% : -7.30, -4.13; 0.000 01), and total effect [risk ratio (): 1.23, 95% : 1.15, 1.32; 0.000 01]. The BP-lowering effect of AA was significantly higher than that of placebo [systolic BP (SBP): -8.05, 95% : -8.67, -7.43; 0.000 01; diastolic BP (DBP): -6.66, 95% : -7.31, -6.01, 0.000 01]. The total effect also improved significantly from baseline with AA than placebo (: 10.85, 95% : 4.71, 24.98; 0.000 01). Traditional Chinese Medicine symptoms score were significantly reduced by AA compared with Western Medicine (: -1.75, 95% : -2.52, -0.99; 0.000 01), 10 trials reported adverse events, indicating that the safety of SSYX Capsule is still uncertain.
conclusionsApplication therapies may be considered a safe and beneficial for the treatment of hypertension and can reduce BP and improve the total effect. Further well-designed trials are needed to support our conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.