ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2022
A simple neural vector space model for medical concept normalization using concept embeddings.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomedical text normalization through generative modeling.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- Using Structured Codes and Free-Text Notes to Measure Information Complementarity in Electronic Health Records: Feasibility and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Use of SNOMED CT in Large Language Models: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Recognition and normalization of multilingual symptom entities using in-domain-adapted BERT models and classification layers.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Mapping vaccine names in clinical trials to vaccine ontology using cascaded fine-tuned domain-specific language models.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2024Article
- Performance and clinical utility of a new supervised machine-learning pipeline in detecting rare ciliopathy patients based on deep phenotyping from electronic health records and semantic similarity.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Mapping Vaccine Names in Clinical Trials to Vaccine Ontology using Cascaded Fine-Tuned Domain-Specific Language Models.Research square · 2023Article
- An overview of biomedical entity linking throughout the years.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Review
- Unsupervised SapBERT-based bi-encoders for medical concept annotation of clinical narratives with SNOMED CT.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMedical concept normalization (MCN), the task of linking textual mentions to concepts in an ontology, provides a solution to unify different ways of referring to the same concept. In this paper, we present a simple neural MCN model that takes mentions as input and directly predicts concepts. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe evaluate our proposed model on clinical datasets from ShARe/CLEF eHealth 2013 shared task and 2019 n2c2/OHNLP shared task track 3. Our neural MCN model consists of an encoder, and a normalized temperature-scaled softmax (NT-softmax) layer that maximizes the cosine similarity score of matching the mention to the correct concept. We adopt SAPBERT as the encoder and initialize the weights in the NT-softmax layer with pre-computed concept embeddings from SAPBERT.
resultsOur proposed neural model achieves competitive performance on ShARe/CLEF 2013 and establishes a new state-of-the-art on 2019-n2c2-MCN. Yet this model is simpler than most prior work: it requires no complex pipelines, no hand-crafted rules, and no preprocessing, making it simpler to apply in new settings. DISCUSSION: Analyses of our proposed model show that the NT-softmax is better than the conventional softmax on the MCN task, and both the CUI-less threshold parameter and the initialization of the weight vectors in the NT-softmax layer contribute to the improvements.
conclusionWe propose a simple neural model for clinical MCN, an one-step approach with simpler inference and more effective performance than prior work. Our analyses demonstrate future work on MCN may require more effort on unseen concepts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.