Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35472296›Full record

ArticleACS nano2022

Magnetic Anisotropy of Individual Nanomagnets Embedded in Biological Systems Determined by Axi-asymmetric X-ray Transmission Microscopy.

Lourdes Marcano, Iñaki Orue, David Gandia, Lucía Gandarias, Markus Weigand, Radu Marius Abrudan, Ana García-Prieto, Alfredo García-Arribas, Alicia Muela, M Luisa Fdez-Gubieda and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Progress of nanomaterials in the treatment of thrombus.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lourdes MarcanoHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9397-6122
Iñaki OrueSGIker, Universidad del País Vasco - UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Spain.
David GandiaBCMaterials, Bld. Martina Casiano third floor, 48940 Leioa, Spain.
Lucía GandariasDpto. Inmunología, Microbiología y Parasitología, Universidad del País Vasco - UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Spain.
Markus WeigandHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Radu Marius AbrudanHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Ana García-PrietoDpto. Física Aplicada, Universidad del País Vasco - UPV/EHU, 48013 Bilbao, Spain.
Alfredo García-ArribasDpto. Electricidad y Electrónica, Universidad del País Vasco - UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1580-0302
Alicia MuelaDpto. Inmunología, Microbiología y Parasitología, Universidad del País Vasco - UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Spain.
M Luisa Fdez-GubiedaDpto. Electricidad y Electrónica, Universidad del País Vasco - UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6076-7738
Sergio ValenciaHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3912-5797
University of the Basque Country · ESHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie · DEBasque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few years, the use of nanomagnets in biomedical applications has increased. Among others, magnetic nanostructures can be used as diagnostic and therapeutic agents in cardiovascular diseases, to locally destroy cancer cells, to deliver drugs at specific positions, and to guide (and track) stem cells to damaged body locations in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. All these applications rely on the magnetic properties of the nanomagnets which are mostly determined by their magnetic anisotropy. Despite its importance, the magnetic anisotropy of the individual magnetic nanostructures is unknown. Currently available magnetic sensitive microscopic methods are either limited in spatial resolution or in magnetic field strength or, more relevant, do not allow one to measure magnetic signals of nanomagnets embedded in biological systems. Hence, the use of nanomagnets in biomedical applications must rely on mean values obtained after averaging samples containing thousands of dissimilar entities. Here we present a hybrid experimental/theoretical method capable of working out the magnetic anisotropy constant and the magnetic easy axis of individual magnetic nanostructures embedded in biological systems. The method combines scanning transmission X-ray microscopy using an axi-asymmetric magnetic field with theoretical simulations based on the Stoner-Wohlfarth model. The validity of the method is demonstrated by determining the magnetic anisotropy constant and magnetic easy axis direction of 15 intracellular magnetite nanoparticles (50 nm in size) biosynthesized inside a magnetotactic bacterium.

Indexed as

Magnetite NanoparticlesMicroscopyAnisotropyMagneticsX-RaysMagnetite Nanoparticlesmagnetic anisotropymagnetic nanoparticlemagnetotactic bacteriaMagnetovibrio blakemorei MV-1nanomagnetsscanning transmission X-ray microscopyX-ray magnetic circular dichroism

Identifiers

PMID35472296
PMCPMC9878725
OpenAlexW4224999005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.