Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35472090›Full record

ArticleFEMS yeast research2022

Directed evolution as an approach to increase fructose utilization in synthetic grape juice by wine yeast AWRI 796.

Michelle E Walker, Tommaso L Watson, Christopher R L Large, Yan Berkovich, Tom A Lang, Maitreya J Dunham, Sean Formby, Vladimir Jiranek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS yeast research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Michelle E WalkerDepartment of Wine Science, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Tommaso L WatsonDepartment of Wine Science, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Christopher R L LargeDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Yan BerkovichDepartment of Wine Science, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Tom A LangDepartment of Wine Science, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Maitreya J DunhamDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Sean FormbyBioinformatics Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, Genome Sciences Centre, BCCA, 100-570 West 7th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada.
Vladimir JiranekDepartment of Wine Science, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In winemaking, slow or stuck alcoholic fermentation can impact processing efficiency and wine quality. Residual fructose in the later stages of fermentation can leave the wine 'out of specification' unless removed, which requires reinoculation or use of a more fructophilic yeast. As such, robust, fermentation efficient strains are still highly desirable to reduce this risk. We report on a combined EMS mutagenesis and Directed Evolution (DE) approach as a 'proof of concept' to improve fructose utilization and decrease fermentation duration. One evolved isolate, Tee 9, was evaluated against the parent, AWRI 796 in defined medium (CDGJM) and Semillon juice. Interestingly, Tee 9 exhibited improved fermentation in CDGJM at several nitrogen contents, but not in juice. Genomic comparison between AWRI 796 and Tee 9 identified 371 mutations, but no chromosomal copy number variation. A total of 95 noncoding and 276 coding mutations were identified in 297 genes (180 of which encode proteins with one or more substitutions). Whilst introduction of two of these, Gid7 (E726K) or Fba1 (G135S), into AWRI 796 did not lead to the fermentation improvement seen in Tee 9, similar allelic swaps with the other mutations are needed to understand Tee 9's adaption to CDGJM. Furthermore, the 378 isolates, potentially mutagenized but with the same genetic background, are likely a useful resource for future phenotyping and genome-wide association studies.

Indexed as

VitisWineDNA Copy Number VariationsFermentationFructoseGenome-Wide Association StudySaccharomyces cerevisiaeFructoseCRISPR/Cas9directed evolutionfermentationfructosegenomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID35472090
PMCPMC9329090
OpenAlexW4225012126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.