Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35472047›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2022

School performance in Danish children exposed to maternal type 1 diabetes in utero: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Anne Lærke Spangmose, Niels Skipper, Sine Knorr, Tina Wullum Gundersen, Rikke Beck Jensen, Peter Damm, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Anja Pinborg, Jannet Svensson, Tine Clausen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gestational Diabetes: An Update 60 Years After O'Sullivan and Mahan.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Review
  4. Maternal type 1 diabetes, preterm birth, and risk of intellectual disability in the offspring: A nation-wide study in Sweden.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy and Women's Health in the 21st Century.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anne Lærke SpangmoseFertility Department, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7541-5858
Niels SkipperDepartment of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sine KnorrSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6552-5340
Tina Wullum GundersenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Rikke Beck JensenDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4522-672X
Peter DammCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Department of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2067-5246
Erik Lykke MortensenDepartment of Public Health and Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6985-451X
Anja PinborgFertility Department, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8340-104X
Jannet SvenssonDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescents, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev-Gentofte, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9365-0728
Tine ClausenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConflicting results have been reported concerning possible adverse effects on the cognitive function of offspring of mothers with type 1 diabetes (O-mT1D). Previous studies have included offspring of parents from the background population (O-BP), but not offspring of fathers with type 1 diabetes (O-fT1D) as the unexposed reference group. METHODS AND

findingsThis is a population-based retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2016. Nationally standardized school test scores (range, 1 to 100) were obtained for public school grades 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 in O-mT1D and compared with those in O-fT1D and O-BP. Of the 622,073 included children, 2,144 were O-mT1D, and 3,474 were O-fT1D. Multiple linear regression models were used to compare outcomes, including the covariates offspring with type 1 diabetes, parity, number of siblings, offspring sex, smoking during pregnancy, parental age, and socioeconomic factors. Mean test scores were 54.2 (standard deviation, SD 24.8) in O-mT1D, 54.4 (SD 24.8) in O-fT1D, and 56.4 (SD 24.7) in O-BP. In adjusted analyses, the mean differences in test scores were -1.59 (95% CI -2.48 to -0.71, p < 0.001) between O-mT1D and O-BP and -0.78 (95% CI -1.48 to -0.08, p = 0.03) between O-fT1D and O-BP. No significant difference in the adjusted mean test scores was found between O-mT1D and O-fT1D (p = 0.16). The study's limitation was no access to measures of glycemic control during pregnancy.

conclusionsO-mT1D achieved lower test scores than O-BP but similar test scores compared with O-fT1D. Glycemic control during pregnancy is essential to prevent various adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes. However, the present study reduces previous concerns regarding adverse effects of in utero hyperglycemia on offspring cognitive function.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Prenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsChildCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35472047
PMCPMC9041831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.