Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471999›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing-based multi-cancer early detection "liquid biopsy" blood test in over 1,000 dogs using an independent testing set: The CANcer Detection in Dogs (CANDiD) study.

Andi Flory, Kristina M Kruglyak, John A Tynan, Lisa M McLennan, Jill M Rafalko, Patrick Christian Fiaux, Gilberto E Hernandez, Francesco Marass, Prachi Nakashe, Carlos A Ruiz-Perez and 55 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond the Needle: Is Liquid Biopsy the Future of Veterinary Medicine?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The role of epigenetic alterations in canine mammary cancer.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review of Molecular Technologies for Investigating Canine Cancer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

65 authors.

Andi FloryPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Kristina M KruglyakPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
John A TynanPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Lisa M McLennanPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Jill M RafalkoPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3241-9781
Patrick Christian FiauxPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9614-7370
Gilberto E HernandezPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Francesco MarassPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8993-7320
Prachi NakashePetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Carlos A Ruiz-PerezPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Donna M FathPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Thuy JenningsPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Rita Motalli-PepioPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Kate WotrangPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Angela L McCleary-WheelerPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Susan LanaDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Brenda PhillipsVeterinary Specialty Hospital of San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Brian K FlesnerDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2459-7054
Nicole F LeibmanThe Animal Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Tracy LaDueSoutheast Veterinary Oncology and Internal Medicine, Orange Park, Florida, United States of America.
Chelsea D TrippBridge Animal Referral Center, Edmonds, Washington, United States of America.
Brenda L CoomberDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0776-5562
J Paul WoodsInstitute for Comparative Cancer Investigation at the Mona Campbell Centre for Animal Cancer, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Mairin MillerVeterinary Specialty Hospital of North County, San Marcos, California, United States of America.
Sean W AikenVeterinary Specialty Hospital of San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Amber Wolf-RingwallDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Minnesota, College of Veterinary Medicine, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Antonella BorgattiDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Minnesota, College of Veterinary Medicine, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1939-0611
Kathleen KraskaVeterinary Specialty Hospital of San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Christopher B ThomsonVeterinary Specialty Hospital of North County, San Marcos, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3673-7800
Alane Kosanovich CahalaneVeterinary Specialty Hospital of Hong Kong, Wan Chai, Hong Kong.
Rebecca L MurrayBridge Animal Referral Center, Edmonds, Washington, United States of America.
William C KisseberthDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Maria A Camps-PalauThe Animal Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Franck FlochOncovet, Villeneuve-D'ascq, France.
Claire Beaudu-LangeClinique Vétérinaire de la Pierre Bleue, Pipriac, France.
Aurélia Klajer-PeresEiffelvet, Paris, France.
Olivier KeravelEiffelvet, Paris, France.
Luc-André Fribourg-BlancClinique Vétérinaire SeineVet, Rouen, France.
Pascale Chicha MazetierClinique Vétérinaire Mazetier, Argenteuil, France.
Angelo MarcoGovernor Animal Clinic, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Molly B McLeodCity Paws Home Health, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Erin PortilloVCA Valley Oak Veterinary Center, Chico, California, United States of America.
Terry S ClarkVCA Metroplex Animal Hospital, Irving, Texas, United States of America.
Scott JuddPrices Creek Veterinary Services, Lewisburg, Ohio, United States of America.
C Kirk FeinbergGovernor Animal Clinic, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Marie BenitezGovernor Animal Clinic, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Candace RunyanCarlsbad Animal Hospital, Carlsbad, California, United States of America.
Lindsey HackettOceanside Veterinary Hospital, Oceanside, California, United States of America.
Scott LafeyAmici Pet Hospital of Little Italy, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Danielle RichardsonInstitute for Comparative Cancer Investigation at the Mona Campbell Centre for Animal Cancer, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah VineyardColony Veterinary Hospital, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Mary Tefend CampbellCarriage Hills Animal Hospital, Montgomery, Alabama, United States of America.
Nilesh DharajiyaHealthbit.ai Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Taylor J JensenLaboratory Corporation of America, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Dirk van den BoomAdvisor to PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Luis A DiazAdvisor to PetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Daniel S GrosuPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5870-1545
Arthur PolkPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3019-1843
Kalle MarsalPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Susan Cho HicksPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Katherine M LytlePetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7826-0107
Lauren HoltvoigtPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Jason ChibukPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Ilya ChornyPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Dana W Y TsuiPetDx, La Jolla, California, United States of America.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is the leading cause of death in dogs, yet there are no established screening paradigms for early detection. Liquid biopsy methods that interrogate cancer-derived genomic alterations in cell-free DNA in blood are being adopted for multi-cancer early detection in human medicine and are now available for veterinary use. The CANcer Detection in Dogs (CANDiD) study is an international, multi-center clinical study designed to validate the performance of a novel multi-cancer early detection "liquid biopsy" test developed for noninvasive detection and characterization of cancer in dogs using next-generation sequencing (NGS) of blood-derived DNA; study results are reported here. In total, 1,358 cancer-diagnosed and presumably cancer-free dogs were enrolled in the study, representing the range of breeds, weights, ages, and cancer types seen in routine clinical practice; 1,100 subjects met inclusion criteria for analysis and were used in the validation of the test. Overall, the liquid biopsy test demonstrated a 54.7% (95% CI: 49.3-60.0%) sensitivity and a 98.5% (95% CI: 97.0-99.3%) specificity. For three of the most aggressive canine cancers (lymphoma, hemangiosarcoma, osteosarcoma), the detection rate was 85.4% (95% CI: 78.4-90.9%); and for eight of the most common canine cancers (lymphoma, hemangiosarcoma, osteosarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, mast cell tumor, mammary gland carcinoma, anal sac adenocarcinoma, malignant melanoma), the detection rate was 61.9% (95% CI: 55.3-68.1%). The test detected cancer signal in patients representing 30 distinct cancer types and provided a Cancer Signal Origin prediction for a subset of patients with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, the test accurately detected cancer signal in four presumably cancer-free subjects before the onset of clinical signs, further supporting the utility of liquid biopsy as an early detection test. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that NGS-based liquid biopsy can offer a novel option for noninvasive multi-cancer detection in dogs.

Indexed as

HemangiosarcomaOsteosarcomaAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorDogsEarly Detection of CancerHematologic TestsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID35471999
PMCPMC9041869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.