Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471976›Full record

ArticlePsychosomatic medicine

State-Level Regulations Regarding the Protection of Sexual Minorities and Birth Outcomes: Results From a Population-Based Cohort Study.

Bethany G Everett, Aubrey Limburg, Sarah McKetta, Mark L Hatzenbuehler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychosomatic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bethany G EverettFrom the Department of Sociology (Everett), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Sociology and Institute of Behavioral Science (Limburg), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado; Department of Epidemiology (McKetta), Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City, New York; and Department of Psychology (Hatzenbuehler), Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Aubrey Limburg
Sarah McKetta
Mark L Hatzenbuehler
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

University of Colorado Population CenterP2CHD066613 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI JANE A MENKEN · 2015 to 2026
$3.7M
The University of Colorado Population CenterR24HD066613 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI PAMPEL, FRED C · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
Role of Stress in Shaping Maternal, Infant, and Child OutcomesR01HD091405 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI EVERETT, BETHANY · 2018 to 2020
$959k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD066613NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091405NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD066613NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD009936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe leverage state-level variability in social policies that confer legal protections for sexual minorities (e.g., employment nondiscrimination acts) and examine their association with birth outcomes among sexual minority women.

methodsWe link measures of structural protections (i.e., social policies) to a prospective, population-based cohort of US adults-the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health ( n = 7913 total singleton births, n = 274 singleton births to bisexual women, n = 53 singleton births to lesbian women)-which includes measurement of key risk factors for birth outcomes over the life course.

resultsLesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB) policy protections were associated with better birth outcomes for lesbian women. For example, among lesbian women, the predicted birth weight for infants in states with no policy protections was 3.01 kg (95% confidence interval = 2.71-3.30) but was 3.71 kg (95% confidence interval = 3.46-3.96) in states with three or four policy protections. In negative control analyses, there was no association between LGB policy protections and birth outcomes among the nonstigmatized group (i.e., heterosexual women), providing evidence of specificity. Furthermore, in states with the most LGB policy protections, lesbian women were at lower risk for preterm births and had infants with higher birth weights than heterosexual and bisexual women. These associations remained robust after adjusting for 13 risk factors, including demographics, prior and current indicators of socioeconomic status, preconception and perinatal risk factors, and neighborhood characteristics.

conclusionsThese results provide novel evidence that sexual orientation-related policy protections, measured at the state level, are associated with a decreased risk for adverse birth outcomes among lesbian women.

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesAdolescentAdultBisexualityCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMalePregnancyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35471976
PMCPMC9271587
OpenAlexW4224980338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.