Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471721›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2022

Efficacy and Safety of LY2963016 Insulin Glargine in Chinese Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Previously Treated with Insulin Glargine (Lantus

Xiang Yan, Chen Feng, Ying Lou, Zhiguang Zhou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03338023 (A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of a Long-Acting Basal Insulin Analog, LY2963016, to Lantus® in Combination With Mealtime Insulin Lispro in Adult Chinese Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03338023 phase3completednot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of a Long-Acting Basal Insulin Analog, LY2963016, to Lantus® in Combination With Mealtime Insulin Lispro in Adult Chinese Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2018 to 2020Enrolled272ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArmsLY2963016, Lantus®, Insulin Lispro
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiang YanNational Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology (Central South University), Ministry of Education, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Zhong Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Chen FengLilly (Shanghai) Management Co., Ltd., No. 288 Shimen No.1 Road, Jingan District, Shanghai, 200041, China.
Ying LouLilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., No. 288 Shimen No.1 Road, Jingan District, Shanghai, 200041, China.
Zhiguang ZhouNational Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology (Central South University), Ministry of Education, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Zhong Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. zhouzhiguang@csu.edu.cn.
Central South University · CNLilly (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar), a biosimilar of Lantus® insulin glargine (IGlar), demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety versus the reference product in Chinese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in the randomized, phase III ABES trial. This post hoc analysis aimed to provide the first evidence for switching from IGlar to LY IGlar in Chinese patients with T1DM.

methodsThis analysis included 210/272 patients with T1DM (77.2%) from the ABES trial who were receiving IGlar at screening. We compared antihyperglycemic efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in patients randomized to LY IGlar (n = 104) versus those who continued to receive IGlar (n = 106).

resultsThere was no significant difference between groups in least-squares mean (LSMean) change in HbA1c from baseline to 24 weeks (LY IGlar - 0.10%, IGlar - 0.08%; LSMean difference [95% confidence interval] - 0.02% [- 0.24, 0.19]). At 24 weeks (last observation carried forward), a similar proportion of patients in each group achieved glycated hemoglobin less than 7.0% (LY IGlar 26.5%, IGlar 32.1%; P = 0.447) and 6.5% or less (LY IGlar 16.7%, IGlar 20.8%; P = 0.482). There were no significant differences between groups in LSMean of self-monitored blood glucose values, or total or basal insulin dose at 24 weeks. Patients in the LY IGlar and IGlar groups had a similar incidence of total hypoglycemia (blood glucose level 70 mg/dL or less, 91.4% vs. 92.5%) and treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs; 75.0% vs. 67.0%), and a low and similar incidence of serious AEs, injection site AEs, and allergic AEs. Similar proportions of patients in the LY IGlar and IGlar groups had treatment-emergent antibody responses (LY IGlar 27.2%, IGlar 28.3%) and detectable insulin antibodies (LY IGlar 52.4%, IGlar 53.8%).

conclusionIn Chinese patients with T1DM previously treated with IGlar, switching to LY IGlar for 24 weeks resulted in similar efficacy and safety outcomes as remaining on IGlar therapy. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT03338023.

Indexed as

BiosimilarInsulin glargineLantusLY2963016SwitchingType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35471721
PMCPMC9174415
OpenAlexW4224438722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.