Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471688›Full record

ArticlePulmonary therapy2022

Patients with Severe Uncontrolled Asthma: Perception of Asthma Control and its Management.

Maureen George, Camille Graff, Alexis Bombezin-Domino, Emilie Pain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. A survey of severe asthma in Canada: results from the CASCADE practice reflective program.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  4. Clinical inertia in asthma.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maureen GeorgeColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9234-7842
Camille GraffCarenity, 1 rue de Stockholm, 75008, Paris, France.
Alexis Bombezin-DominoCarenity, 1 rue de Stockholm, 75008, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6713-6768
Emilie PainCarenity, 1 rue de Stockholm, 75008, Paris, France. emilie@carenity.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8414-5829
ParisTech · FRColumbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of our observational study was to understand how patients with uncontrolled severe asthma perceive asthma control, and to assess their views on the role of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and other stakeholders in asthma management.

methodsIn total, 200 patients with uncontrolled, severe asthma living in Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, or the USA registered on the Carenity asthma community responded to a patient survey.

resultsWhile 62% of respondents indicated they knew a lot about asthma, they were not entirely satisfied with its control. The two most helpful tools considered important in long-term asthma control were centered on learning, with tips on asthma control (76%), as well as information on asthma and its causes (67%). Although asthma education programs were accessible to less than half (44%) of the respondents, 72% said they would find them useful. In the previous year, most patients (78%) consulted a specialist; however, while 54% of respondents participated in shared decision-making (SDM) concerning their treatment, less than one-third (29%) felt their opinion had been considered, and only 27% said it helped their HCPs to develop an informed action plan. However, 48% believed that SDM would help them feel more confident in achieving long-term control. Most respondents consulted emergency room doctors or nurse practitioners because of their uncontrolled severe asthma, finding them persuasive sources of information. Additionally, patient advocacy organizations (PAGs) were considered as a preferred (12%) or persuasive (6%) source by only a few patients.

conclusionMost people with uncontrolled severe asthma were well informed about their disease. However, better information on asthma management would be useful for patients, with HCPs involved in this process. SDM was welcomed by respondents, but, to be successful, the patients' opinions should be taken into consideration when forming an asthma management action plan.

Indexed as

Patient studyShared decision-makingUncontrolled severe asthma

Identifiers

PMID35471688
PMCPMC9098739
OpenAlexW4224937944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.