Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471627›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2022

Cerebellar Representations of Errors and Internal Models.

Martha L Streng, Laurentiu S Popa, Timothy J Ebner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cerebellar control of targeted tongue movements.The Journal of physiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Post-COVID breathlessness: a mathematical model of respiratory processing in the brain.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Cerebellar Functions Beyond Movement and Learning.Annual review of neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martha L StrengDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Laurentiu S PopaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Timothy J EbnerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. ebner001@umn.edu.

Funding

ROLE OF THE CEREBELLUM IN VISUALLY GUIDED ARM MOVEMENTSR01NS018338 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI EBNER, TIMOTHY J · 1985 to 2020
$4.7M
Cerebellar computations in health and epilepsyK99NS121274 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI STRENG, MARTHA L · 2022 to 2023
$226k
NIH HHS R01 NS18338NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS121274NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS018338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After decades of study, a comprehensive understanding of cerebellar function remains elusive. Several hypotheses have been put forward over the years, including that the cerebellum functions as a forward internal model. Integrated into the forward model framework is the long-standing view that Purkinje cell complex spike discharge encodes error information. In this brief review, we address both of these concepts based on our recordings of cerebellar Purkinje cells over the last decade as well as newer findings from the literature. During a high-dimensionality tracking task requiring continuous error processing, we find that complex spike discharge provides a rich source of non-error signals to Purkinje cells, indicating that the classical error encoding role ascribed to climbing fiber input needs revision. Instead, the simple spike discharge of Purkinje cells carries robust predictive and feedback signals of performance errors, as well as kinematics. These simple spike signals are consistent with a forward internal model. We also show that the information encoded in the simple spike is dynamically adjusted by the complex spike firing. Synthesis of these observations leads to the hypothesis that complex spikes convey behavioral state changes, possibly acting to select and maintain forward models.

Indexed as

MovementPurkinje CellsAction PotentialsBiomechanical PhenomenaCerebellumComplex spikeForward internal modelKinematicsPerformance errorPrediction errorPurkinje cellSimple spike

Identifiers

PMID35471627
PMCPMC9420826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.