Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471619›Full record

ArticleOecologia2022

Improved plant heat shock resistance is introduced differently by heat and insect infestation: the role of volatile emission traits.

Bin Liu, Eve Kaurilind, Lu Zhang, Chikodinaka N Okereke, Triinu Remmel, Ülo Niinemets

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bin LiuChair of Crop Science and Plant Biology, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, Estonia. bin.liu@emu.ee.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4738-8690
Eve KaurilindChair of Crop Science and Plant Biology, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, Estonia.
Lu ZhangZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Germplasm Innovation and Utilization for Garden Plants, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou, 311300, China.
Chikodinaka N OkerekeChair of Crop Science and Plant Biology, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, Estonia.
Triinu RemmelChair of Crop Science and Plant Biology, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, Estonia.
Ülo NiinemetsChair of Crop Science and Plant Biology, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, Estonia.
Estonian University of Life Sciences · EEEstonian Academy of Sciences · EEZhejiang A & F University · CN

Funding

eesti maaülikool P190252PKTTeesti teadusagentuur PRG947EU Regional Development Fund the AnaEE Estonia Projecteuropean regional development fund Centre of Excellence EcolChangeEuropean Research Council 322603European Research Council SIP-VOL+european union regional development fund Estonian Plant Biology Infrastructure-PLANT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat stress is one of the most important abiotic stresses confronted by plants under global climate change. Plant exposure to abiotic or biotic stress can improve its tolerance to subsequent severe episodes of the same or different stress (stress priming), but so far there is limited comparative information about how pre-exposures to different abiotic and biotic elicitors alter plant resistance to severe heat stress. We exposed the perennial herb Melilotus albus Medik., a species rich in secondary metabolites, to moderate heat stress (35 °C) and greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum West.) infestation to comparatively determine whether both pre-treatments could enhance plant tolerance to the subsequent heat shock (45 °C) stress. Plant physiological responses to stress were characterized by photosynthetic traits and volatile organic compound emissions through 72 h recovery. Heat shock treatment reduced net assimilation rate (A) and stomatal conductance in all plants, but heat-primed plants had significantly faster rates of recovery of A than other plants. By the end of the recovery period, A in none of the three heat shock-stressed groups recovered to the control level, but in whitefly-infested plants it reached the pre-heat shock level. In heat-primed plants, the heat shock treatment was associated with a fast rise of monoterpene emissions, and in whitefly-infested plants with benzenoid emissions and an increase in total phenolic content.

Indexed as

HemipteraVolatile Organic CompoundsAnimalsHeat-Shock ResponsePhotosynthesisStress, PhysiologicalVolatile Organic CompoundsBenzenoidsHeat primingHeat shockPlant secondary metabolitesTerpenoidsWhitefly infestation

Identifiers

PMID35471619
OpenAlexW4224884309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.