Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471568›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Participation in Prioritization of Research Questions in Pediatric Hospital Medicine.

Peter J Gill, Ann Bayliss, Aubrey Sozer, Francine Buchanan, Karen Breen-Reid, Kim De Castris-Garcia, Mairead Green, Michelle Quinlan, Noel Wong, Shelley Frappier and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Priority setting for children and young people with chronic conditions and disabilities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Peter J GillDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann BaylissTrillium Health Partners, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Aubrey SozerDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Francine BuchananDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Karen Breen-ReidLawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kim De Castris-GarciaParent Advocate, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mairead GreenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle QuinlanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Noel WongDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shelley FrappierDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Katherine CowanJames Lind Alliance, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Carol ChanChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dana ArafehDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mohammed Rashid AnwarChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Colin MacarthurDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia C ParkinDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eyal CohenDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sanjay MahantDivision of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Canadian Pediatric Inpatient Research Network (PIRN)

Funding

CIHR PAO-169399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The research agenda in pediatric hospital medicine has seldom considered the perspectives of young people, parents and caregivers, and health care professionals. Their perspectives may be useful in identifying questions on topics for research. Objective: To prioritize unanswered research questions in pediatric hospital medicine from the perspectives of young people, parents/caregivers, and health care professionals. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between August 4, 2020, and August 19, 2021, two online surveys and a virtual workshop were conducted, using modified Delphi technique and nominal group technique. Young people, parents/caregivers, and health care professionals with experiences in pediatric hospital medicine in Canada were included. Interventions: The established James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership method was used. In phase 1, a survey collected unanswered questions regarding pediatric hospital medicine via 3 open-ended questions. Survey responses were used to develop summary questions that went through an evidence-checking process. Unanswered questions were brought to a phase 2 interim prioritization survey. The top 10 unanswered research questions in pediatric hospital medicine were established at the final priority setting workshop. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey responses, top 10 research questions. Results: The phase 1 survey was completed by 188 participants (148 of 167 [89%] females; 17 of 167 [10%] males; mean [SD] age, 39.5 [12.4] years) and generated 495 unanswered research questions and comments, of which 58 were deemed out of scope. The remaining 437 responses were grouped into themes (eg, communication, shared decision-making, health service delivery, and health service management) and then refined to 75 unanswered research questions. Of these 75, only 4 questions had sufficient evidence. To make the number of questions in phase 2 manageable, 21 questions submitted by only 1 respondent were eliminated. Fifty unanswered research questions were included in the phase 2 survey, which was completed by 201 participants (165 of 186 [89%] females; 19 of 186 [10%] males; mean [SD] age, 40.0 [11.0] years). A short list of 16 questions-the top 10 questions from patient partners (youths, parents/caregivers) and clinicians-was presented at the final priority setting workshop and the top 10 questions were prioritized. The top 10 questions focused on the care of special inpatient populations (eg, children with medical complexity), communication, shared decision-making, support strategies in the hospital, mental health supports, shortening length of stay, and supporting Indigenous patients, parents/caregivers, and families. Conclusions and Relevance: This patient-oriented pediatric hospital medicine priority setting partnership identified the most important unanswered research questions focused on the care of children in the hospital. These questions provide a possible roadmap for research on areas deemed important to young people, parents/caregivers, and clinicians.

Indexed as

CaregiversMedicineAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHospitals, PediatricHumansMaleResearch DesignSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35471568
PMCPMC9044112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.