Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471534›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Modeling Dendrites and Spatially-Distributed Neuronal Membrane Properties.

Spyridon Chavlis, Panayiota Poirazi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Spyridon ChavlisInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Panayiota PoiraziInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. poirazi@imbb.forth.gr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first step toward understanding the brain is to learn how individual neurons process incoming signals, the vast majority of which arrive in their dendrites. Dendrites were first discovered at the beginning of the twentieth century and were characterized by great anatomical variability, both within and across species. Over the past years, a rich repertoire of active and passive dendritic mechanisms has been unveiled, which greatly influences their integrative power. Yet, our understanding of how dendrites compute remains limited, mainly because technological limitations make it difficult to record from dendrites directly and manipulate them. Computational modeling, on the other hand, is perfectly suited for this task. Biophysical models that account for the morphology as well as passive and active neuronal properties can explain a wide variety of experimental findings, shedding new light on how dendrites contribute to neuronal and circuit computations. This chapter aims to help the interested reader build biophysical models incorporating dendrites by detailing how their electrophysiological properties can be described using simple mathematical frameworks. We start by discussing the passive properties of dendrites and then give an overview of how active conductances can be incorporated, leading to realistic in silico replicas of biological neurons.

Indexed as

DendritesNeuronsBiophysicsComputer SimulationSynapsesActive channelsCable theoryComputational modelingDendritesHH equations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.