Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471464›Full record

ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2022

Novel materials in magnetic resonance imaging: high permittivity ceramics, metamaterials, metasurfaces and artificial dielectrics.

Andrew Webb, Alena Shchelokova, Alexey Slobozhanyuk, Irena Zivkovic, Rita Schmidt

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metamaterial Antennas Enhance MRI of the Eye and Occipital Brain.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A high-performance ceramic volume coil for preclinical MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2026
    Article
  7. Comparison ofMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. In Vivo Brain BNMR in biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. In vivoMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew WebbDepartment of Radiology, C.J. Gorter MRI Centre, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. a.webb@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4045-9732
Alena ShchelokovaSchool of Physics and Engineering, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Alexey SlobozhanyukSchool of Physics and Engineering, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Irena ZivkovicDepartment of Electrical Engineering, TU Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Rita SchmidtDepartment of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
ITMO University · RUEindhoven University of Technology · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

European Research Council 670629Russian Science Foundation 21-79-30038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews recent developments in designing and testing new types of materials which can be: (i) placed around the body for in vivo imaging, (ii) be integrated into a conventional RF coil, or (iii) form the resonator itself. These materials can improve the quality of MRI scans for both in vivo and magnetic resonance microscopy applications. The methodological section covers the basic operation and design of two different types of materials, namely high permittivity materials constructed from ceramics and artificial dielectrics/metasurfaces formed by coupled conductive subunits, either in air or surrounded by dielectric material. Applications of high permittivity materials and metasurfaces placed next to the body to neuroimaging and extremity imaging at 7 T, body and neuroimaging at 3 T, and extremity imaging at 1.5 T are shown. Results using ceramic resonators for both high field in vivo imaging and magnetic resonance microscopy are also shown. The development of new materials to improve MR image quality remains an active area of research, but has not yet found significant use in clinical applications. This is mainly due to practical issues such as specific absorption rate modelling, accurate and reproducible placement, and acceptable size/weight of such materials. The most successful area has been simple "dielectric pads" for neuroimaging at 7 T which were initially developed somewhat as a stop-gap while parallel transmit technology was being developed, but have continued to be used at many sites. Some of these issues can potentially be overcome using much lighter metasurfaces and artificial dielectrics, which are just beginning to be assessed.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingCeramicsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPhantoms, ImagingArtificial dielectricsDielectricsHigh permittivity materialsMetamaterialsMetasurfacesTransmit efficiency

Identifiers

PMID35471464
PMCPMC9596558
OpenAlexW4224935516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.