Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471172›Full record

ArticleBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2022

COVID-19 and risk assessment room for public health in four Colombian crossborder territories

Claudia Marcela Muñoz, Marcela Rocío Arias, Martha Patricia López, Laura Victoria Ortiz, Natalia María Carrillo, Luis Antonio Alvarado, Andrea Morillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claudia Marcela MuñozPrograma de Entrenamiento en Epidemiología de Campo-FETP Colombia, Dirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. cmunoz@ins.gov.co.
Marcela Rocío AriasDirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Martha Patricia LópezPrograma de Entrenamiento en Epidemiología de Campo-FETP Colombia, Dirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Laura Victoria OrtizDirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Natalia María CarrilloDirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Luis Antonio AlvaradoPrograma de Entrenamiento en Epidemiología de Campo-FETP Colombia, Dirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Andrea MorilloPrograma de Entrenamiento en Epidemiología de Campo-FETP Colombia, Dirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. biomedica@ins.gov.co.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Public health risk management in Colombia is led by the Instituto Nacional de Salud. In the face of the COVID-19 emergency, response actions centered on the implementation of risk analysis rooms and the strengthening of surveillance at points of entry into the country. Objective: To analyze the implementation and maintenance phases of the COVID-19 risk analysis rooms in four border departments of Colombia. Materials and methods: We conducted a qualitative study of public health risk analysis rooms for COVID-19. We reviewed the documentation and data generated from March to June, 2020, in the departments of Amazonas, Vichada, Guainía, and Putumayo. We did semi-structured interviews with key actors and analyzed the answers using the NVivo plus version 11 application in three cycles: open coding, identification of emerging categories, and modeling by analyzing the identified strengths and weaknesses. Results: We identified the components of the incident command structure and the relationships between the public health areas. Strengths were evidenced in the integration of the areas: the management of information in real time, the border surveillance and the capabilities of rapid response teams, while weaknesses appeared in planning, community surveillance, and risk communication processes. Conclusions: Risk analysis rooms constitute a joint effort at the national and local levels which has promoted the articulated participation of all actors in the analysis of information and the optimization of an organized response during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19ColombiaHumansborder sanitary controlCoronavirus infections/epidemiologypandemicsrisk management

Identifiers

PMID35471172
PMCPMC9050067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.