Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471057›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2022

Investigating Instructor Talk among Graduate Teaching Assistants in Undergraduate Biology Laboratory Classrooms.

Katharine A Gelinas, Dax Ovid, Wilmer Amaya-Mejia, Rafael Ayala, Hanna E Baek, Eric Gasmin, Karina Hissen, Amanda Johnson, Emily Kossa, Lauren Levesque and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Katharine A GelinasDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Dax OvidDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Wilmer Amaya-MejiaDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Rafael AyalaDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Hanna E BaekDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Eric GasminDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Karina HissenDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Amanda JohnsonDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Emily KossaDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Lauren LevesqueDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Kurt R LutzDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Amichai S LyonsDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Alan F MataDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Casey G MitchellDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Lisa PaggeotDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Maria José Pastor-InfantasDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Cheryl PatelDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Susan Prestol-CasillasDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Kevin Xu ChenDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
Kimberly D TannerDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132.
San Francisco State University · USCornell University · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of California, Merced · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instructor Talk-noncontent and nonlogistical language that is focused on shaping the classroom learning environment-is a recently defined variable that may play an important role in how undergraduates experience courses. Previous research characterized Instructor Talk used by faculty teaching in biology lecture classrooms. However, graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) and laboratory classrooms represent critical factors in undergraduate education, and Instructor Talk in this context has yet to be explored. Here, we present findings analyzing Instructor Talk used by GTAs teaching in undergraduate biology laboratory classrooms. We characterized the Instructor Talk used by 22 GTA instructors across 24 undergraduate biology laboratory courses in the context of a single, urban, Hispanic-serving and Asian American and Pacific Islander-serving Institution. We found that Instructor Talk was present in every course studied, GTAs with pedagogical training and prior teaching experience used more Instructor Talk than those without, and GTAs teaching laboratory courses used more Instructor Talk than previous observations of faculty teaching lecture courses. Given the widespread use of Instructor Talk and its varying use across contexts, we predict that Instructor Talk may be a critical variable in teaching, specifically in promoting equity and inclusion, which merits continued study in undergraduate science education.

Indexed as

FacultyStudentsBiologyHumansLaboratoriesLearningTeaching

Identifiers

PMID35471057
PMCPMC9508911
OpenAlexW4224936462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.