Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35471042›Full record

ReviewAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2022

Leaks in the Pipeline: a Failure Analysis of Gram-Negative Antibiotic Development from 2010 to 2020.

Neha K Prasad, Ian B Seiple, Ryan T Cirz, Oren S Rosenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The 3D Value Framework for Sustainable Access to Effective Antibiotics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. New inhibitors of themSphere · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Negamycin: Nature's Forgotten Antibiotic.ACS infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Siderophore cephalosporins.EcoSal Plus · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance: Innovative Drugs in Antibacterial Research.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neha K PrasadChan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4635-3795
Ian B SeipleDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ryan T CirzRevagenix Inc., San Mateo, California, USA.
Oren S RosenbergChan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5736-4388

Funding

Vulnerabilities in Mycobacterial Cell-Wall BiogenesisP01AI095208 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SACCHETTINI, JAMES C · 2012 to 2022
$19.8M
Research Training in Chemistry and Chemical BiologyT32GM145460 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Jason E Gestwicki · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
Clinical translation of D-amino acid derived PET tracers for imaging spinalinfectionR01EB024014 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI OHLIGER, MICHAEL, WILSON, DAVID M · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
Protein secretion in bacterial pathogensR01AI128214 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GROSS, CAROL ANNE · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI095208NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI128214NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024014NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned that our current arsenal of antibiotics is not innovative enough to face impending infectious diseases, especially those caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Although the current preclinical pipeline is well stocked with novel candidates, the last U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotic with a novel mechanism of action against Gram-negative bacteria was discovered nearly 60 years ago. Of all the antibiotic candidates that initiated investigational new drug (IND) applications in the 2000s, 17% earned FDA approval within 12 years, while an overwhelming 62% were discontinued in that time frame. These "leaks" in the clinical pipeline, where compounds with clinical potential are abandoned during clinical development, indicate that scientific innovations are not reaching the clinic and providing benefits to patients. This is true for not only novel candidates but also candidates from existing antibiotic classes with clinically validated targets. By identifying the sources of the leaks in the clinical pipeline, future developmental efforts can be directed toward strategies that are more likely to flow into clinical use. In this review, we conduct a detailed failure analysis of clinical candidates with Gram-negative activity that have fallen out of the clinical pipeline over the past decade. Although limited by incomplete data disclosure from companies engaging in antibiotic development, we attempt to distill the developmental challenges faced by each discontinued candidate. It is our hope that this insight can help de-risk antibiotic development and bring new, effective antibiotics to the clinic.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGram-Negative BacteriaHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticsclinical trialsGram-negativetoxicity

Identifiers

PMID35471042
PMCPMC9112940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.