Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35470964›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2022

The effect of different wound dressing materials used in postoperative treatment of wounds after total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

Yingjia Yuan, Jin Li, Ke Wang, Guanqiang Zheng, Shengting Chai

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. 'No Dressing' Strategy for Post-operative Orthopaedic Cases.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Occlusive wound dressings: A greenhouse for bacteria?Journal of infection prevention · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingjia YuanBone Injury Rehabilitation Research Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics & Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jin LiBone Injury Rehabilitation Research Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics & Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ke WangBone Injury Rehabilitation Research Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics & Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Guanqiang ZhengRehabilitation Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics & Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shengting ChaiJoint Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics & Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6911-6800
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A meta-analysis was performed to assess the effect of different wound dressing materials used in the postoperative treatment of wounds after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A systematic literature search up to January 2022 incorporated 16 trials involving 2765 subjects after THA or TKA at the beginning of the study: 1447 were using active and interactive dressings, and 1318 were using passive dressings. The statistical tools like the dichotomous or continuous method were used within a random or fixed-influence model to establish the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the influence of different wound dressing materials used in postoperative treatment of wounds after THA and TKA. Active and interactive dressings had significantly lower overall wound complications (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.26-0.40, P < 0.001), number of dressing changes (MD, -1.53; 95% CI, -2.09 to -0.96, P < 0.001), and early dressing change need (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.47, P = 0.002) compared with passive dressings for subjects after THA and TKA. Active and interactive dressings had significantly lower overall wound complications, the number of dressing changes, and early dressing change need compared with passive dressings for subjects after THA and TKA. Furthermore, evidence is needed to confirm the outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBandagesHumansSurgical Wound InfectionWound Healingactive dressingsinteractive dressingspassive dressingstotal hip arthroplastytotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35470964
PMCPMC9705168
OpenAlexW4224938962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.