Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35470930›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2022

Strategies for managing marine disease.

Caroline K Glidden, Laurel C Field, Silke Bachhuber, Shannon M Hennessey, Robyn Cates, Lesley Cohen, Elin Crockett, Michelle Degnin, Maya K Feezell, Heather K Fulton-Bennett and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Strategies for managing marine disease.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Caroline K GliddenDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9839-5781
Laurel C FieldDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Silke BachhuberDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Shannon M HennesseyDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6737-1362
Robyn CatesCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Lesley CohenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Elin CrockettCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Michelle DegninCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Maya K FeezellDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5095-5548
Heather K Fulton-BennettDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5938-9714
Devyn PiresCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Brittany N PoirsonDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0171-5510
Zachary H RandellDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2342-1652
Erick WhiteDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Sarah A GravemDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3857-9930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) has increased in wildlife populations in recent years and is expected to continue to increase with global environmental change. Marine diseases are relatively understudied compared with terrestrial diseases but warrant parallel attention as they can disrupt ecosystems, cause economic loss, and threaten human livelihoods. Although there are many existing tools to combat the direct and indirect consequences of EIDs, these management strategies are often insufficient or ineffective in marine habitats compared with their terrestrial counterparts, often due to fundamental differences between marine and terrestrial systems. Here, we first illustrate how the marine environment and marine organism life histories present challenges and opportunities for wildlife disease management. We then assess the application of common disease management strategies to marine versus terrestrial systems to identify those that may be most effective for marine disease outbreak prevention, response, and recovery. Finally, we recommend multiple actions that will enable more successful management of marine wildlife disease emergencies in the future. These include prioritizing marine disease research and understanding its links to climate change, improving marine ecosystem health, forming better monitoring and response networks, developing marine veterinary medicine programs, and enacting policy that addresses marine and other wildlife diseases. Overall, we encourage a more proactive rather than reactive approach to marine wildlife disease management and emphasize that multidisciplinary collaborations are crucial to managing marine wildlife health.

Indexed as

Communicable Diseases, EmergingEcosystemAnimalsAnimals, WildAquatic OrganismsClimate Changedisease ecologymarine conservationmarine wildlife

Identifiers

PMID35470930
PMCPMC9786832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.