Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35470194›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Induction of labour at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk obese women: study protocol for a randomised controlled study.

Lise Qvirin Krogh, Sidsel Boie, Tine Brink Henriksen, Jim Thornton, Jens Fuglsang, Julie Glavind

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04603859 (When to INDuce for OverWeight? - a Randomised Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04603859 narecruitingnot on this map

When to INDuce for OverWeight? - a Randomised Controlled Trial (WINDOW)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2020 to 2026Enrolled1,900ConditionsPregnancy, Obesity, ParturitionArmsElective induction of labor at 39 gestational weeks and 0 to 3 days
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Body mass index and failed induction of labor: A cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lise Qvirin KroghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark lise.qvirin.krogh@clin.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-7397-4576
Sidsel BoieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Tine Brink HenriksenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6933-8294
Jim ThorntonFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9764-6876
Jens FuglsangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Julie GlavindDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKRegional Hospital Randers · DKUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G9533539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObesity is associated with many pregnancy complications, including both fetal macrosomia and prolonged labour. As a result, there is often also an increased risk of caesarean section. In other settings, labour induction near to term reduces adverse outcomes such as stillbirth and birth injury, without causing more caesarean deliveries. It has been suggested that induction will reduce adverse events in this setting too, but there have been no trials and the effect on caesarean section is unknown. The objective of this study is to compare induction of labour in gestational week 39 with expectant management on the risk of caesarean section in women with body mass index ≥30 kg/m METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An open label randomised controlled multicentre trial are conducted at Danish delivery departments with an in-house neonatal intensive care unit. Recruitment started October 2020. A total of 1900 women with a prepregnancy body mass index ≥30 kg/m ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Central Denmark Region Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics approved the study. The study is conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the latest version of the 'Declaration of Helsinki' and the 'Guideline for Good Clinical Practice' related to experiments on humans. The trial findings will be disseminated to participants, clinicians, commissioning groups and via peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04603859.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionWatchful WaitingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLabor, InducedMulticenter Studies as TopicObesityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicMaternal medicineNEONATOLOGYOBSTETRICS

Identifiers

PMID35470194
PMCPMC9039382
OpenAlexW4224922013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.