Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35470187›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Prediction of pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders using metabolomics: a systematic review.

Jussara Mayrink, Debora F Leite, Guilherme M Nobrega, Maria Laura Costa, Jose Guilherme Cecatti

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. T174M-M235TCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Novel biomarkers for preeclampsia: Promises and pitfalls.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jussara MayrinkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campinas, Brazil.
Debora F LeiteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campinas, Brazil.
Guilherme M NobregaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9406-4256
Maria Laura CostaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campinas, Brazil.
Jose Guilherme CecattiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campinas, Brazil cecatti@unicamp.br.ORCID 0000-0003-1285-8445
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the accuracy of metabolomics in predicting hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

designSystematic review of observational studies. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: An electronic literature search was performed in June 2019 and February 2022. Two researchers independently selected studies published between 1998 and 2022 on metabolomic techniques applied to predict the condition; subsequently, they extracted data and performed quality assessment. Discrepancies were dealt with a third reviewer. The primary outcome was pre-eclampsia. Cohort or case-control studies were eligible when maternal samples were taken before diagnosis of the hypertensive disorder. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsData on study design, maternal characteristics, how hypertension was diagnosed, metabolomics details and metabolites, and accuracy were independently extracted by two authors.

resultsAmong 4613 initially identified studies on metabolomics, 68 were read in full text and 32 articles were included. Studies were excluded due to duplicated data, study design or lack of identification of metabolites. Metabolomics was applied mainly in the second trimester; the most common technique was liquid-chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Among the 122 different metabolites found, there were 23 amino acids and 21 fatty acids. Most of the metabolites were involved with ammonia recycling; amino acid metabolism; arachidonic acid metabolism; lipid transport, metabolism and peroxidation; fatty acid metabolism; cell signalling; galactose metabolism; nucleotide sugars metabolism; lactose degradation; and glycerolipid metabolism. Only citrate was a common metabolite for prediction of early-onset and late-onset pre-eclampsia. Vitamin D was the only metabolite in common for pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension prediction. Meta-analysis was not performed due to lack of appropriate standardised data. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Metabolite signatures may contribute to further insights into the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia and support screening tests. Nevertheless, it is mandatory to validate such methods in larger studies with a heterogeneous population to ascertain the potential for their use in clinical practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018097409.

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPre-EclampsiaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsPregnancyepidemiologyhypertensionmaternal medicine

Identifiers

PMID35470187
PMCPMC9039389
OpenAlexW4224928102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.