ArticleBMJ case reports2022
Prenatal diagnosis of craniorachischisis totalis.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Craniorachischisis Totalis: A Detailed Case Report.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2025Article
- Craniorachischisis in a 33-week-old Female Fetus: A Case Report.Acta medica Philippina · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Craniorachischisis totalis (anencephaly with total open spina bifida) is the most severe form of neural tube defects. The exact aetiology of neural tube defects remains poorly understood. We report a case of a primigravida in her 20s with a fetus in which craniorachischisis totalis was diagnosed during the first-trimester ultrasound at 11 weeks of gestation. The parents opted for pregnancy termination and the diagnosis was confirmed postnatally. Besides the lack of folic acid supplementation during preconception, no other risk factor was found. This case highlights the importance of the first-trimester ultrasound in the diagnosis of severe malformations. The right diagnosis is crucial for future prenatal counselling, yet investigation is still required to better understand the aetiology behind neural tube defects and assess the possibility of underlying genetic features, thus enabling better counselling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.