Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35470056›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiac failure2022

Increased Opportunities for Transplantation for Women in the New Heart Allocation System.

Ersilia M Defilippis, Lauren K Truby, Kevin J Clerkin, Elena Donald, Lauren Sinnenberg, Anubodh S Varshney, Rebecca Cogswell, Michelle M Kittleson, Jennifer H Haythe, Michael M Givertz and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiac failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Heart Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Sex Differences in Cardiac Transplantation.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Ersilia M DefilippisDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Lauren K TrubyDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Kevin J ClerkinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Elena DonaldDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Lauren SinnenbergDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Anubodh S VarshneyDivision of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rebecca CogswellDivision of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Michelle M KittlesonDivision of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Jennifer H HaytheDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Michael M GivertzDivision of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eileen M HsichHeart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Richa AgarwalDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Veli K TopkaraDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Maryjane Farrand the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: arr@utsouthwestern.edu.
Columbia University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Impact of Disparities Affecting Survival among Advanced Heart Failure Patients and Transplant RecipientsR01HL141892 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI HSICH, EILEEN MICHELLE, ISHWARAN, HEMANT · 2018 to 2021
$2.8M
Identifying Novel Diagnostics and Mechanisms for Cardiac Allograft VasculopathyK23HL148528 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CLERKIN, KEVIN J · 2020 to 2024
$852k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL148528NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, women have had less access to advanced heart failure therapies, including temporary and permanent mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation (HT), with worse waitlist and post-transplant survival compared with men. This study evaluated for improvement in sex differences across all phases of HT in the 2018 allocation system. METHODS AND

resultsThe United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to identify adult patients (≥18 years) listed for HT from October 18, 2016, to October 17, 2018 (old allocation), and from October 18, 2018, to October 18, 2020 (new allocation). The outcomes of interest included waitlist survival, pretransplant use of temporary and durable mechanical circulatory support, rates of HT, and post-transplant survival. There were 15,629 patients who were listed for HT and included in this analysis; 7745 (2039 women, 26.3%) in the new and 7875 patients (2074 women, 26.3%) in the old allocation system. When compared with men in the new allocation system, women were more likely to have lower priority United Network for Organ Sharing status at time of transplant, and less likely to be supported by an intra-aortic balloon pump (27.1% vs 32.2%, P < .001), with no difference in the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (5.5% vs 6.3%, P = .28). Despite these findings, when transplantation was viewed in the context of risk for death or delisting, the cumulative incidence of transplant within 6 months of listing was higher in women than men in the new allocation system (62.4% vs 54.9%, P < .001) with no differences in post-transplant survival. When comparing women in the old with the new allocation system, the distance traveled for organ procurement was 187.5 ± 207.0 miles vs 272.8 ± 233.7 miles (P < .001).

conclusionsAlthough the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support in women remains lower than in men in the new allocation system, more women are being transplanted with comparable waitlist and post-transplant outcomes as men. Broader sharing may be making its greatest impact on improving transplant opportunities for women.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureHeart TransplantationAdultFemaleHumansIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingMaleRetrospective StudiesWaiting ListsdisparitiesHeart transplantationmechanical circulatory supportsexwomen

Identifiers

PMID35470056
PMCPMC10257979
OpenAlexW4224230023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.