Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35469748›Full record

ArticleExplore (New York, N.Y.)

Religious and secular spirituality: Methodological implications of definitions for health research.

Camila Chagas, Leonardo Breno Martins, Fatima Regina Machado, Welligton Zangari, José Carlos Fernandes Galduróz

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Explore (New York, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camila ChagasUniversidade Federal de São Paulo-UNIFESP, Department of Psychobiology, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: psicologia.chagas@gmail.com.
Leonardo Breno MartinsUniversidade de São Paulo-USP, Department of Social Psychology, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fatima Regina MachadoUniversidade de São Paulo-USP, Department of Social Psychology, São Paulo, Brazil.
Welligton ZangariUniversidade de São Paulo-USP, Department of Social Psychology, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Carlos Fernandes GaldurózUniversidade Federal de São Paulo-UNIFESP, Department of Psychobiology, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of spirituality as a research topic has been increasingly recognized, which has led to several studies on the topic. Areas including psychology, medicine, and nursing have produced studies on spirituality under a plurality of definitions and methods, which reveals the complexity of the theme. However, this has resulted in a range of potential problems, including: (1) the use of overlapping and contradictory terms between studies, or even within the same study, (2) research methodologies that do not fit the definitions (sometimes unreflectively) assumed by the authors, (3) difficulties, or even the impossibility, of comparing the results of studies, (4) controversies in respect of the inclusion/exclusion of secular groups in research on spirituality, and (5) ambiguous measurements, often being exclusively dependent on each participant's individual interpretation of what spirituality means. This article discusses these problems, recommends theoretical and methodological alternatives and presents taxonomy of definitions of spirituality.

Indexed as

SpiritualitySpiritual TherapiesHumansResearch DesignDefinitionsHealthMethodologyReligiositySpirituality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.