Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35469725›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2022

Abstract task representations for inference and control.

Avinash R Vaidya, David Badre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Similar Response Dynamics Represent Opposite Behaviors and Rewards in the Frontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Layers of Social Meaning: Innate, Acquired, and Deliberative Levels of Referential Signal Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Complex functions of human lateral frontopolar cortex.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025
    Review
  14. Predictive encoding of auditory sequences in the human prefrontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Task-Switch Related Reductions in Neural Distinctiveness in Children and Adults: Commonalities and Differences.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Cognitive Control.Annual review of psychology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Avinash R VaidyaDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Electronic address: avinash_vaidya@brown.edu.
David BadreDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

Funding

The organization of neural representations for flexible behavior in the human brainR01MH125497 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BADRE, DAVID · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
Investigating the neural systems supporting memory-based decision-makingF32MH116592 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI VAIDYA, AVINASH RAO · 2018 to 2020
$188k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH116592NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral flexibility depends on our capacity to build and leverage abstract knowledge about tasks. Recently, two separate lines of research have implicated distinct brain networks in representing abstract task information: a frontoparietal cortical network, and a network involving the medial temporal lobe (MTL), medial prefrontal, and orbitofrontal cortex (OMPFC). These observations have mostly been made in parallel, with little attempt to understand their relationship. Here, we hypothesize that abstract task representations in these networks differ primarily in format, not content. Namely, that the MTL-OMPFC network maintains task knowledge in a flexible cognitive map, while the frontoparietal network formats this knowledge as productions that facilitate action selection. We discuss novel implications and predictions for behavioral flexibility arising from this hypothesis.

Indexed as

Prefrontal CortexTemporal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingabstractionbehavioral flexibilitycognitive controlcognitive mapdecision-makingdorsolateral prefrontal cortexentorhinal cortexfrontoparietal cortexgeneralizationhippocampusinferencelearningmedial temporal lobememoryorbitofrontal cortexproduction rulereinforcement learningrostrolateral prefrontal cortexventromedial prefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID35469725
PMCPMC9117476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.