Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35469549›Full record

ArticleRenal failure2022

Artificial intelligence in peritoneal dialysis: general overview.

Qiong Bai, Wen Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Renal failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Effect of Remote and Virtual Technology on Home Dialysis.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qiong BaiDepartment of Nephrology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wen TangDepartment of Nephrology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis article is a general overview about artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) algorithms in the domain of peritoneal dialysis (PD).

methodsWe searched studies that used AI/ML in PD, which were classified according to the type of algorithm and PD issue.

resultsStudies were divided into (a) predialytic stratification, (b) peritoneal technique issues, (c) infections, and (d) complications prediction. Most of the studies were observational and majority of them were reported after 2010.

conclusionsThere is a number of studies proved that AI/ML algorithms can predict better than conventional statistical method and even nephrologists. However, the soundness of AI/ML algorithms in PD still requires large databases and interpretation by clinical experts. In the future, we hope that AI will facilitate the management of PD patients, thus increasing the quality of life and survival.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePeritoneal DialysisAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningQuality of LifeArtificial intelligencemachine learningperitoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID35469549
PMCPMC9045776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.