Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35469510›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Self-Reported Knowledge and Attitude of Physicians in Jordan.

Mohammad A Y Alqudah, Raneem Al-Samman, Obada Matalgah, Rana Abu Farhah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessment of prostate cancer awareness and screening knowledge among men in Najran, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Novel Mutations inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad A Y AlqudahDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, 59105The University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-7210-7964
Raneem Al-SammanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, 37251Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Obada MatalgahDepartment of Anesthesia and Recovery, Faculty of Medicine, 37251Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Rana Abu FarhahDepartment of Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, 108579Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JOApplied Science Private University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PC) screening aims to detect PC in early stages, amenable to curative treatment and reduction in disease morbidity and mortality. However, PC screening may be associated with overdiagnosis and complications of unnecessary treatment for indolent disease. Therefore, careful patient selection for PC screening is critical to avoid overestimation and missed diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess physicians' knowledge and attitude towards early detection of PC in Jordan and whether their knowledge is an important predictor of their attitude. An electronic, self-reported questionnaire was used to collect data on demographics, knowledge, and attitude of physicians regarding early detection of PC. The participants' responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression. Around 296 physicians agreed to participate in this study. Most respondents were males (75.7%), residents (34%), practiced medicine more than 15 years (29%) and graduated (81.4%) from local universities. Surprisingly, only 28.4% recognized PC as a non-self-detected disease and less than one-half (48.6%) were aware that PC screening tests are not enough to exclude a diagnosis of PC. The median knowledge Percent of Maximum Possible (POMP) score was 59%. Around two-thirds of participants showed a positive attitude towards early detection of PC (median attitude POMP score was 66%). Higher attitude scores were significantly associated with younger age, those working in private hospitals, and those having higher knowledge POMP score (

Indexed as

PhysiciansProstatic NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansJordanMaleSelf Reportattitudeearly-detectionknowledgephysiciansprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35469510
PMCPMC9052823
OpenAlexW4224946965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.