ArticleTrends in hearing
Guidelines for Diagnosing and Quantifying Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Hearing Protection: Evaluating Innovative Training Modalities for Optimal Fitting Outcomes.La Medicina del lavoro · 2025Trial
- Prediction of risk of hearing loss by industry noise from cross-sectional and longitudinal data.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Development and empirical validation of a multi-criteria decision-making model for the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in high-exposure industrial settings.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Association between occupational noise-induced hearing loss and cognitive function: a multimodal cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Hearing Function in the Orchestra Professional Musicians of the Teatro alla Scala in Milan.La Medicina del lavoro · 2025Article
- Optimization of utilizing the HHIE-S for hearing screening in older people: a cross-sectional study of associated factors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Guidelines for Diagnosis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Their Specificity.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025Article
- A scoping review of the prevalence of musicians' hearing loss.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Serial Monitoring of the Audiogram in Hearing Conservation using Gaussian Processes.Frontiers in audiology and otology · 2024Article
- Healthcare Professionals and Noise-Generating Tools: Challenging Assumptions about Hearing Loss Risk.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Effect of Auricular Point Acupressure Therapy on Noise-Induced Tinnitus: A Retrospective Analysis.Noise & healthArticle
- Sensitivity of Methods for Diagnosing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Cases of Exposures Including Intense Low-Frequency Noise.Trends in hearingArticle
- Advancing Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Risk Assessment in the Era of Large-Scale Data.Noise & healthReview
- Diagnosing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Sustained During Military Service Using Deep Neural Networks.Trends in hearingArticle
- Modification of a Method for Diagnosing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Sustained During Military Service.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
- From sound waves to molecular and cellular mechanisms: Understanding noise‑induced hearing loss and pioneering preventive approaches (Review).Medicine internationalReview
- The role of the occupational physician in the early detection of occupational diseases.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMTReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This paper makes recommendations for the diagnosis and quantification of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in a medico-legal context. A distinction is made between NIHL produced by: steady broadband noise, as occurs in some factories; more impulsive factory sounds, such as hammering; noise exposure during military service, which can involve very high peak sound levels; and exposure to very intense tones. It is argued that existing diagnostic methods, which were primarily developed to deal with NIHL produced by steady broadband noise, are not adequate for the diagnosis of NIHL produced by different types of exposures. Furthermore, some existing diagnostic methods are based on now-obsolete standards, and make unrealistic assumptions. Diagnostic methods are proposed for each of the types of noise exposure considered. It is recommended that quantification of NIHL for all types of exposures is based on comparison of the measured hearing threshold levels with the age-associated hearing levels (AAHLs) for a non-noise exposed population, as specified in ISO 7029 (2017), usually using the 50
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.