Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35469333›Full record

ArticleJournal of computing in higher education2022

Virtual clinical assessment in medical education: an investigation of online conference technology.

Harish Thampy, Sarah Collins, Elora Baishnab, Jess Grundy, Kurt Wilson, Timothy Cappelli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computing in higher education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Feasibility and reliability of the pandemic-adapted online-onsite hybrid graduation OSCE in Japan.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Student and instructor perspectives following a virtual objective structured clinical examination.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harish ThampySchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7850-4378
Sarah CollinsSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Elora BaishnabSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jess GrundySchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kurt WilsonSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Timothy CappelliSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, medical education institutions were suddenly and unexpectedly faced with making significant changes in delivering their clinical assessments to comply with social distancing requirements and limited access to clinical education centres. Seeking a potential solution to these new circumstances, we designed, implemented and evaluated an online virtual OSCE, as a 'proof of concept' intervention study. Our qualitative research involved document analysis of the stages of decision-making and consultation in designing the intervention, and thematic analysis based on the perspectives and experiences of the key stakeholders (final year students, clinical examiners, simulated patients and faculty staff who acted as station assistants), gathered through surveys with Likert-scale questions and free text comments, and online discussion groups which were recorded and transcribed. From our analysis, we identified four themes: optimising assessment design for online delivery, ensuring clinical authenticity, recognising and addressing feelings and apprehensions, and anticipating challenges through incident planning and risk mitigation. Through the data gathered at each stage of the intervention, and the involvement of key stakeholders in the design and evaluation, our study highlights examples of effective practice for future applications of online technologies in assessment, provides guidance for designing and implementing online virtual assessment, and lays a foundation for comparative, longitudinal research on the significant and increasing roles played by technology in healthcare professional education and practice.

Indexed as

Healthcare professional educationQualitative interventionVirtual assessment online

Identifiers

PMID35469333
PMCPMC9022162
OpenAlexW4224231214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.