ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Metabolic Differences between Ex-Smokers and Nonsmokers: A Metabolomic Analysis.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of untargeted omics biomarkers of exposure and effect for tobacco research.Addiction neuroscience · 2023Article
- Update on metabolomic findings in COPD patients.ERJ open research · 2023Review
- Retracted: Metabolic Differences between Ex-Smokers and Nonsmokers: A Metabolomic Analysis.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- Trend of Metabolic Syndrome Indicators in Working Korean Women According to Smoking Status and Workplace Size: A Population-Based Retrospective Longitudinal Study.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-28Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare changes in the metabolite levels of ex-smokers and nonsmokers using a metabolomics approach, accounting for the weight gain in ex-smokers. Volunteer ex-smokers and nonsmokers were recruited from two cohorts Shijingshan (174) and Xishan (78), respectively, at a 1 : 1 ratio for age and sex. Nontargeted metabolomics was performed on the volunteers' blood samples using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and multivariate statistical analysis was performed using principal component analysis and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis. Enrichment analysis was used to identify Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways associated with differential metabolites and weighted gene co-expression network analysis and maximal correlation coefficient (MCC) algorithms were used to identify key metabolites. The results revealed no significant differences between the distribution of blood metabolite levels in the ex-smokers and nonsmokers. The biosynthesis of valine, leucine, and isoleucine was determined to be associated with differential metabolites, and five key metabolites were identified. Further analysis revealed differences in weight gain and regained metabolite levels in ex-smokers, and 10 differential metabolites were identified that may be associated with weight gain in ex-smokers. These findings suggest that quitting smoking restores metabolites to almost normal levels and results in weight gain. The identified key metabolites and metabolic pathways may also provide a basis for clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.