Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35469207›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Recommendation System for Privacy-Preserving Education Technologies.

Shasha Xu, Xiufang Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shasha XuZhengzhou Preschool Education College, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2642-8649
Xiufang YinZhengzhou Preschool Education College, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the priority for personalized and fully customized learning systems, the innovative computational intelligent systems for personalized educational technologies are the timeliest research area. Since the machine learning models reflect the data over which they were trained, data that have privacy and other sensitivities associated with the education abilities of learners, which can be vulnerable. This work proposes a recommendation system for privacy-preserving education technologies that uses machine learning and differential privacy to overcome this issue. Specifically, each student is automatically classified on their skills in a category using a directed acyclic graph method. In the next step, the model uses differential privacy which is the technology that enables a facility for the purpose of obtaining useful information from databases containing individuals' personal information without divulging sensitive identification about each individual. In addition, an intelligent recommendation mechanism based on collaborative filtering offers personalized real-time data for the users' privacy.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPrivacyArtificial IntelligenceEducational TechnologyHumansTechnology

Identifiers

PMID35469207
PMCPMC9034935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.