Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35469203›Full record

ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2022

Targeted glucocorticoid analysis using ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS).

Shon P Neal, Katie M Wilson, Diana C Velosa, Christopher D Chouinard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Understanding isotopes, isomers, and isobars in mass spectrometry.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2024
    Review
  2. Improving LC-MS/MS measurements of steroids with differential mobility spectrometry.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advances in MS instrumentation: The present and future of the clinical lab.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shon P NealChemistry Program, Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.
Katie M WilsonChemistry Program, Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.
Diana C VelosaChemistry Program, Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.
Christopher D ChouinardChemistry Program, Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.
Florida Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) is an emerging technique in the -omics fields that has broad potential applicability to the clinical lab. As a rapid, gas-phase structure-based separation technique, IM-MS offers promise in isomer separations and can be easily combined with existing LC-MS methods (i.e., LC-IM-MS). Several experimental conditions, including analyte cation adducts and drift composition further provide a means to tune separations for global and/or targeted applications. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the utility of IM-MS under a range of experimental conditions for detection of glucocorticoids, and specifically for the separation of several isomeric pairs. Methods: LC-IM-MS was used to characterize 16 glucocorticoids including three isomer pairs: cortisone/prednisolone, betamethasone/dexamethasone, and flunisolide/triamcinolone acetonide. Collision cross section (CCS) values were measured for all common adducts (e.g., protonated and sodiated) using both step-field and single-field methods. Alternative alkali, alkaline earth, and transition metals were introduced, such that their adducts could also be measured. Finally, four different drift gases (helium, nitrogen, argon, and carbon dioxide) were compared for their relative separation capability. Results: LC-IM-MS offered a robust, multidimensional separation technique that allowed for the 16 glucocorticoids to be analyzed and separated in three-dimensions (retention time, CCS, and Conclusion: In summary, LC-IM-MS offers potential as a clinical method due to its ease of coupling with traditional LC-MS methods and its promise for tuning separations to better resolve targeted and/or global isomers in complex biological samples.

Indexed as

CCS, collision cross sectionCIMS, cyclic ion mobility spectrometryDMS, differential mobility spectrometryDTIMS, drift tube ion mobility spectrometryFAIMS, field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometryGlucocorticoidsIM-MS, ion mobility-mass spectrometryIMS, ion mobility spectrometryIon mobility-mass spectrometryIon mobility spectrometrySLIM, structures for lossless ion manipulationsTIMS, trapped ion mobility spectrometryTWIMS, traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID35469203
PMCPMC9034309
OpenAlexW4224279568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.