Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35469182›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Nonadherence to Multimodality Cancer Treatment Guidelines in the United States.

Leila T Tchelebi, Biyi Shen, Ming Wang, Louis Potters, Joseph Herman, Daniel Boffa, Joel E Segel, Henry S Park, Nicholas G Zaorsky

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06945484 (PILOT for The Precision Exercise Regimen for Cancer Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06945484 narecruitingnot on this map

PILOT for The Precision Exercise Regimen for Cancer Care (PERCC) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2030Enrolled20ConditionsNSCLC Stage II, NSCLC, Stage IIIArmsPrecision Exercise Regimen for Cancer Care (PERCC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis: One Decade Later.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Leila T TchelebiDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York.
Biyi ShenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Ming WangDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Louis PottersDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York.
Joseph HermanDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York.
Daniel BoffaDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Joel E SegelDepartment of Health Policy Administration, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Henry S ParkDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Nicholas G ZaorskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Pennsylvania State University · USHofstra University · USYale University · USNorthwell Health · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to identify patients with cancer who do not receive guideline-concordant multimodality treatment and to identify factors that are associated with nonreceipt of guideline-concordant multimodality treatment. Methods and Materials: Five cancers for which the multimodal guideline-concordant treatment (with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy) is clearly defined in national guidelines were selected from the National Cancer Database: (1) nonmetastatic anal cancer, (2) locally advanced cervical cancer, (3) nonmetastatic nasopharynx cancer, (4) locally advanced rectal cancer, and (5) locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) of receiving the guideline-concordant treatment versus not, adjusting for common confounding variables. Results: 178,005 patients with cancer were included: 32,214 anal, 54,485 rectal, 13,179 cervical, 5061 nasopharyngeal, and 73,066 lung. Overall, 162,514 (91%) received guideline-concordant treatment and 15,491 (9%) did not. Twenty-one percent of patients with cervical cancer, 10% of patients with rectal cancer, 7% of patients with lung cancer, 5% of patients with anal cancer, and 3% of patients with nasopharynx cancer did not receive guideline-concordant treatment. In general, patients who were older, with comorbid conditions, and who were evaluated at low-volume facilities (odds ratios > 1 with Conclusions: Nearly 1 in 10 patients in this cohort are not receiving appropriate multimodal cancer therapy. There appear to be significant disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant treatment based on primary tumor site, age, comorbidities, and reporting facility.

Identifiers

PMID35469182
PMCPMC9034283
OpenAlexW4220820524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.