Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35469071›Full record

ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2022

[Liposomal bupivacaine-No breakthrough in postoperative pain management].

Berit Otremba, Hanns-Christian Dinges, Ann-Kristin Schubert, Wolfgang Zink, Thorsten Steinfeldt, Hinnerk Wulf, Thomas Wiesmann

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Berit OtrembaKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35033, Marburg, Deutschland. berit.otremba95@gmail.com.
Hanns-Christian DingesKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35033, Marburg, Deutschland.
Ann-Kristin SchubertKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35033, Marburg, Deutschland.
Wolfgang ZinkKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.
Thorsten SteinfeldtKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35033, Marburg, Deutschland.
Hinnerk WulfKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35033, Marburg, Deutschland.
Thomas WiesmannKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35033, Marburg, Deutschland.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main · DEKlinikum Ludwigshafen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main limitations concerning the use of local anesthetics is due to their restricted duration of action. In recent years, liposomal formulations with prolonged release kinetics have been developed to extend the pharmacological duration of action of the 1‑stage peripheral regional anesthesia (single-shot procedure) and thus bring about a longer duration of action. The focus here is particularly on achieving postoperative freedom from pain for at least 24 h (or even better 48 h) and thus early mobilization of patients using on-demand medication causing (at most) minor local sensory blockade without causing motor impairments (at least that is the ideal). Therefore, methods of utilizing slow-release drugs as seen in liposomal carrier systems have experienced increasing scientific attention in the last few years. A common modern pharmacological example with a theoretically significantly longer duration of action is liposomal bupivacaine, an amide local anesthetic. Due to a multivesicular liposome structure, the retarded release of the active component bupivacaine HCl leads to a theoretical pharmacological effectiveness of up to 72 h. Previous studies consistently showed a safety profile comparable to conventional bupivacaine HCl. Liposomal bupivacaine has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the trade name Exparel© (Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Parsippany, NJ, USA) since 2011; however, its use is currently limited to local wound infiltration, transverse abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, and interscalene nerve blocks of the brachial plexus. In 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also approved the use of liposomal bupivacaine for blockade of the brachial plexus or the femoral nerve and as a field block or for wound infiltration to treat postoperative pain. So far, studies on the clinical effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine have been very heterogeneous and there have been no conclusive meta-analyses with sufficient rigor or significance. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses, combining the results of clinical studies regarding the analgesic efficiency of liposomal bupivacaine in different fields of application, consistently refuted any benefit of clinical relevance provided by the liposomal formulation. There is currently sufficient evidence to now end the ongoing debate around liposomal bupivacaine. The aim of this work is to give the reader a current, evidence-based overview of this substance.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ConductionNerve BlockAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineHumansLiposomesPostoperative PainAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineLiposomesBupivacaineDuration of actionLiposomesLocal anestheticsRegional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID35469071
OpenAlexW4224315065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.