Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35468907›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Machine learning-coupled combinatorial mutagenesis enables resource-efficient engineering of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editor activities.

Dawn G L Thean, Hoi Yee Chu, John H C Fong, Becky K C Chan, Peng Zhou, Cynthia C S Kwok, Yee Man Chan, Silvia Y L Mak, Gigi C G Choi, Joshua W K Ho and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Dawn G L Thean *Laboratory of Combinatorial Genetics and Synthetic Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Hoi Yee Chu *Laboratory of Combinatorial Genetics and Synthetic Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1970-1259
John H C FongLaboratory of Combinatorial Genetics and Synthetic Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Becky K C ChanLaboratory of Combinatorial Genetics and Synthetic Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0121-2788
Peng ZhouLaboratory of Combinatorial Genetics and Synthetic Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Cynthia C S KwokLaboratory of Combinatorial Genetics and Synthetic Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Yee Man ChanMing Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Silvia Y L MakMing Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2248-956X
Gigi C G ChoiLaboratory of Combinatorial Genetics and Synthetic Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2774-9188
Joshua W K HoSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2331-7011
Zongli ZhengMing Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4849-4903
Alan S L WongLaboratory of Combinatorial Genetics and Synthetic Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China. aslw@hku.hk.ORCID 0000-0003-1790-3233
Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation · HKState Key Laboratory of Synthetic Chemistry · CNMing Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine · HKChinese University of Hong Kong · HKCity University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome-editing Cas9 protein uses multiple amino-acid residues to bind the target DNA. Considering only the residues in proximity to the target DNA as potential sites to optimise Cas9's activity, the number of combinatorial variants to screen through is too massive for a wet-lab experiment. Here we generate and cross-validate ten in silico and experimental datasets of multi-domain combinatorial mutagenesis libraries for Cas9 engineering, and demonstrate that a machine learning-coupled engineering approach reduces the experimental screening burden by as high as 95% while enriching top-performing variants by ∼7.5-fold in comparison to the null model. Using this approach and followed by structure-guided engineering, we identify the N888R/A889Q variant conferring increased editing activity on the protospacer adjacent motif-relaxed KKH variant of Cas9 nuclease from Staphylococcus aureus (KKH-SaCas9) and its derived base editor in human cells. Our work validates a readily applicable workflow to enable resource-efficient high-throughput engineering of genome editor's activity.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNAHumansMachine LearningMutagenesisBacterial ProteinsDNA

Identifiers

PMID35468907
PMCPMC9039034
OpenAlexW4224949122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.