Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35468898›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2022

Unsupervised machine learning improves risk stratification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an analysis of the Spanish Myeloma Group.

Adrian Mosquera Orgueira, Marta Sonia González Pérez, Jose Diaz Arias, Laura Rosiñol, Albert Oriol, Ana Isabel Teruel, Joaquin Martinez Lopez, Luis Palomera, Miguel Granell, Maria Jesus Blanchard and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian Mosquera Orgueira *Hospital Clínico Universitario Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4838-6750
Marta Sonia González Pérez *Hospital Clínico Universitario Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
Jose Diaz AriasHospital Clínico Universitario Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
Laura RosiñolHospital Clínic, Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2534-9239
Albert OriolInstitut Català d'Oncologia I Institut Josep Carreras, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6804-2221
Ana Isabel TeruelHospital Clínico de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Joaquin Martinez LopezHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, i+12, Complutense University, CNIO, Madrid, Spain.
Luis PalomeraHospital Clínico Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
Miguel GranellHospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0366-3673
Maria Jesus BlanchardHospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Javier de la RubiaHospital Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8354-768X
Ana López de la GuiaHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael RiosHospital Virgen de las Nieves, CIBERESP, Ibs, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8193-1402
Anna SuredaInstitut Català d'Oncologia-Hospitalet, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Miguel Teodoro HernandezHospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6576-7881
Enrique BengoecheaHospital de Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain.
María José CalasanzClínica Universidad de Navarra, CIMA, CIBERONC, IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Norma GutierrezHospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (Universidad de Salamanca-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain.
Maria Luis MartinHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, i+12, Complutense University, CNIO, Madrid, Spain.
Joan BladeHospital Clínic, Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4563-3405
Juan-Jose LahuertaHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, i+12, Complutense University, CNIO, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3393-9570
Jesús San MiguelClínica Universidad de Navarra, CIMA, CIBERONC, IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-4857
Maria Victoria MateosHospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (Universidad de Salamanca-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain. mvmateos@usal.es.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-1218
PETHEMA/GEM Cooperative Group
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Universitario de Canarias · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital Universitario Doctor Peset · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Staging System (ISS) and the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) are commonly used prognostic scores in multiple myeloma (MM). These methods have significant gaps, particularly among intermediate-risk groups. The aim of this study was to improve risk stratification in newly diagnosed MM patients using data from three different trials developed by the Spanish Myeloma Group. For this, we applied an unsupervised machine learning clusterization technique on a set of clinical, biochemical and cytogenetic variables, and we identified two novel clusters of patients with significantly different survival. The prognostic precision of this clusterization was superior to those of ISS and R-ISS scores, and appeared to be particularly useful to improve risk stratification among R-ISS 2 patients. Additionally, patients assigned to the low-risk cluster in the GEM05 over 65 years trial had a significant survival benefit when treated with VMP as compared with VTD. In conclusion, we describe a simple prognostic model for newly diagnosed MM whose predictions are independent of the ISS and R-ISS scores. Notably, the model is particularly useful in order to re-classify R-ISS score 2 patients in 2 different prognostic subgroups. The combination of ISS, R-ISS and unsupervised machine learning clusterization brings a promising approximation to improve MM risk stratification.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRisk AssessmentUnsupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID35468898
PMCPMC9038663
OpenAlexW4224319591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.