Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35468868›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2022

Optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for ICU patients with sepsis.

Keibun Liu, Junichiro Shibata, Kiyoyasu Fukuchi, Kunihiko Takahashi, Tomohiro Sonoo, Takayuki Ogura, Tadahiro Goto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Keibun Liu *Critical Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland and The Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Road, Chermside, Brisbane, QLD, 4032, Australia. keiliu0406@gmail.com.
Junichiro Shibata *Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyoyasu FukuchiFaculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kunihiko TakahashiDepartment of Biostatistics, M&D Data Science Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro SonooTXP Medical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki OguraDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Tochigi Prefectural Emergency and Critical Care Centre, Imperial Foundation Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Tadahiro GotoTXP Medical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPHitachi General Hospital · JPSaiseikai Utsunomiya hospital · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis, mobilization therapy during ICU stay can improve their outcomes during and after the ICU stay. However, little is known about the optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using data from a tertiary medical center in Japan during 2013-2017. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years who were admitted to the ICU with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. We defined early mobilization (EM) as the rehabilitation at the level of sitting on the edge of the bed or more within the first 3 days of the patients' ICU stay. Patients were divided into the EM and non-EM groups. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and ambulatory dependence at hospital discharge. We estimated the effects of EM by stabilized inverse probability weighting (sIPW). We then tested alternative definitions of EM by changing the cutoff in days to mobilization by 1-day increments from 2 to 7 days to investigate the optimal timing of mobilization.

resultsOur study sample consisted of a total of 296 septic patients, including 96 patients in the EM group and 200 patients in the non-EM group. In the sIPW model, the adjusted OR for in-hospital mortality in the EM group compared to the non-EM group was 0.22 [95% CI 0.06-0.88], and the adjusted OR for ambulatory dependence at the hospital discharge was 0.24 [95% CI 0.09-0.61]. When alternative definitions of EM were tested, patients who achieved mobilization within the first 2-4 days of their ICU stays had better outcomes.

conclusionsAchieving mobilization within the first 3 days of ICU stay was significantly associated with better outcomes. Patients with sepsis might benefit most from achieving mobilization within 2-4 days. Further studies are warranted to validate the findings.

Indexed as

Early mobilizationICUIPWMuscle wastingSepsis

Identifiers

PMID35468868
PMCPMC9036689
OpenAlexW4224308259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.