Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35468808›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of mental health systems2022

Management of depression during the perinatal period: state of the evidence.

Idan Falek, Mary Acri, Joanna Dominguez, Jennifer Havens, Mary McCord, Sarah Sisco, Wendy Wilcox, Kimberly Hoagwood

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of mental health systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Challenges of Perinatal Depression Care in Mexico City Health Centers.International journal of women's health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Idan FalekDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA. idan.falek@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-0152
Mary AcriDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Joanna DominguezDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Jennifer HavensDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Mary McCordNew York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, 55 Water St., New York, NY, 10041, USA.
Sarah SiscoNew York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, 55 Water St., New York, NY, 10041, USA.
Wendy WilcoxNew York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, 55 Water St., New York, NY, 10041, USA.
Kimberly HoagwoodDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
New York University · USNew York City Health and Hospitals Corporation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerinatal depression (PND) is a prevalent ailment that affects both the woman and her family. Addressing PND in primary health care, such as pediatrics and obstetric care settings, has been proposed as an effective way to identify and treat women.

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to examine best practices for management of PND in obstetric and pediatric settings, as well as investigate the evidence that supports the guidelines.

methodsGuidelines were identified through a literature search and discussion with experts in the field of perinatal depression, while evidence was examined through a literature search of reviews and thereafter experimental studies.

resultsTwenty-five guidelines, across 17 organizations were retained for analysis. Findings suggest that there is little or varied guidance on the management of PND, as well as a lack of specificity. Treatment was the topic most frequently reported, followed by screening. However best practices vary greatly and often contradict one another. Across all areas, there is inadequate or contrasting evidence to support these guidelines.

conclusionsAlthough there was consensus on the key steps in the pathway to care, the review revealed lack of consensus across guidelines on specific issues relating to identification and management of depression during the perinatal period. Clinicians may use these recommendations to guide their practice, but they should be aware of the limitations of the evidence supporting these guidelines and remain alert to new evidence. There is a clear need for researchers and policymakers to prioritize this area in order to develop evidence-based guidelines for managing perinatal depression.

Indexed as

Guidelines for managementObstetric carePathway to carePediatric carePerinatal depression

Identifiers

PMID35468808
PMCPMC9036756
OpenAlexW4224545482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.