Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35468724›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

Identification of accession-specific variants and development of KASP markers for assessing the genetic makeup of Brassica rapa seeds.

Seongmin Hong, Su Ryun Choi, Jihyeong Kim, Young-Min Jeong, Ju-Sang Kim, Chun-Hee Ahn, Suk-Yoon Kwon, Yong Pyo Lim, Ah-Young Shin, Yong-Min Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Seongmin HongGenome Editing Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Su Ryun ChoiMolecular Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jihyeong KimSeed Industry Promotion Center, Foundation of Agri. Tech. Commercialization & Transfer (FACT), Gimje, Republic of Korea.
Young-Min JeongSeed Industry Promotion Center, Foundation of Agri. Tech. Commercialization & Transfer (FACT), Gimje, Republic of Korea.
Ju-Sang KimDayi International Seed Co., Ltd., 16-35 Ssiat-gilJeollabuk-do, Baeksan-myeon, Gimje, 54324, Korea.
Chun-Hee AhnDayi International Seed Co., Ltd., 16-35 Ssiat-gilJeollabuk-do, Baeksan-myeon, Gimje, 54324, Korea.
Suk-Yoon KwonPlant Systems Engineering Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Yong Pyo Lim *Molecular Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Ah-Young Shin *Plant Systems Engineering Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Min Kim *Genome Editing Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon, Republic of Korea. ymkim@kribb.re.kr.

Funding

Korea Forest Service 2014071H10-2122-AA04Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry 213006-05-5-SBG30Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry 821026-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost crop seeds are F1 hybrids. Seed providers and plant breeders must be confident that the seed supplied to growers is of known, and uniform, genetic makeup. This requires maintenance of pure genotypes of the parental lines and testing to ensure the genetic purity of the F1 seed. Traditionally, seed purity has been assessed with a grow-out test (GOT) in the field, a time consuming and costly venture. Early in the last decade, seed testing with molecular markers was introduced as a replacement for GOT, and Kompetitive allele specific PCR (KASP) markers were recognized as promising tools for genetic testing of seeds. However, the markers available at that time could be inaccurate and applicable to only a small number of accessions or varieties due to the limited genetic information and reference genomes available.

resultsWe identified 4,925,742 SNPs in 50 accessions of the Brasscia rapa core collection. From these, we identified 2,925 SNPs as accession-specific, considering properties of flanking region harboring accession-specific SNPs and genic region conservation among accessions by the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis. In total, 100 accession-specific markers were developed as accession-specific KASP markers. Based on the results of our validation experiments, the accession-specific markers successfully distinguised individuals from the mixed population including 50 target accessions from B. rapa core collection and the outgroup. Additionally, the marker set we developed here discriminated F1 hybrids and their parental lines with distinct clusters.

conclusionsThis study provides efficient methods for developing KASP markers to distinguish individuals from the mixture comprised of breeding lines and germplasms from the resequencing data of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa spp. pekinensis).

Indexed as

Brassica rapaAllelesHumansPlant BreedingPolymerase Chain ReactionSeedsAccession-specific markerB. rapa breedingBrassica rapaKASP markerSeed purity assessment

Identifiers

PMID35468724
PMCPMC9036802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.