Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35468644›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2022

Diagnosis and Management of Preeclampsia: Suggested Guidance on the Use of Biomarkers.

Maria Laura Costa, Ricardo de Carvalho Cavalli, Henri Augusto Korkes, Edson Vieira da Cunha Filho, José Carlos Peraçoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The accuracy of the fullPIERS model in predicting adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: evidence from a tertiary care maternity unit.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  5. Comparison of serum ischemia modified albumin levels between preeclamptic and healthy pregnant women.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Laura CostaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8280-3234
Ricardo de Carvalho CavalliDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5010-4914
Henri Augusto KorkesDepartment of Human Reproduction and Childhood, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5345-3861
Edson Vieira da Cunha FilhoObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Moinhos de Vento-HMV, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8100-1926
José Carlos PeraçoliDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3273-3001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIt is a challenge to consider preeclampsia (PE) diagnosis and management in low and middle-income settings, where it represents a major public health concern. The placenta is the underlying cause of disease, and the plasma concentrations of proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors released by the placenta can reflect the risks of disease progression. Antiangiogenic proteins, such as soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), and proangiogenic, like placental growth factors (PlGF), are directly and inversely correlated with the disease onset, respectively.

methodsNarrative review on the use of biomarkers (sFlt-1 to PlGF ratio) with a suggested guidance protocol.

resultsKey considerations on the use of biomarkers: the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is mainly relevant to rule out PE between 20 and 36 6/7 weeks in cases of suspected PE; however, it should not replace the routine exams for the diagnosis of PE. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio should not be performed after confirmed PE diagnosis (only in research settings). In women with suspected PE, sFlt-1/PlGF ratio < 38 can rule out the diagnosis of PE for 1 week (VPN = 99.3) and up to 4 weeks (VPN= 94.3); sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 38 does not confirm the diagnosis of PE; however, it can assist clinical management. In cases of severe hypertension and/or symptoms (imminent eclampsia), hospitalization is imperative, regardless of the result of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio.

conclusionThe use of biomarkers can help support clinical decisions on the management of suspected PE cases, especially to rule out PE diagnosis, thus avoiding unnecessary interventions, especially hospitalizations and elective prematurity.

Indexed as

Pre-EclampsiaBiomarkersFemaleHumansPlacentaPlacenta Growth FactorPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1BiomarkersPlacenta Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1

Identifiers

PMID35468644
PMCPMC9948147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.